2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2018.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reduced-basis element method for pin-by-pin reactor core calculations in diffusion andSP3approximations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, we form local solutions, obtain POD basis functions based on these solutions, which are then used to form the ROM across the whole reactor. The results also demonstrate that constructing basis functions from clusters (i.e., groups of sub-domains), as done by Cherezov et al [26], produces solutions that are almost as good as using solutions from the entire domain. Section 2 describes the methodology including the governing equations, discretisation, reduced-order modelling methods, domain decomposition methods, the test case and how the different ROMs are constructed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, we form local solutions, obtain POD basis functions based on these solutions, which are then used to form the ROM across the whole reactor. The results also demonstrate that constructing basis functions from clusters (i.e., groups of sub-domains), as done by Cherezov et al [26], produces solutions that are almost as good as using solutions from the entire domain. Section 2 describes the methodology including the governing equations, discretisation, reduced-order modelling methods, domain decomposition methods, the test case and how the different ROMs are constructed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…An application to neutron transport was provided by Cherezov et al [26]. Here, a non-overlapping domain decomposition method was combined with POD and applied to a full reactor core, which was decomposed into sub-domains containing fuel assemblies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For discretising the neutron diffusion equation, the most commonly used methods are the finite difference method, the finite element method, and nodal methods [40][41][42]. The latter give fast and accurate solutions, but require a reconstruction step to obtain the pin-power distribution [37]. Using finite element or finite difference methods avoids this step.…”
Section: Discretisation Of the High-fidelity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational domains lend themselves to decomposition into physically meaningful subdomains, as, for example, a reactor consists of many fuel assemblies and an assembly comprises many fuel pins. Jamelot and Ciarlet Jr [36] and Cherezov et al [37] both applied these methods to neutron diffusion, the latter applying a reduced basis method to subsets or clusters of assemblies making up a simple reactor with promising results. Phillips et al [38] proposed several methods combining domain decomposition and ROMs, in which the basis functions are derived by grouping together snapshots relating to (i) the same material type, (ii) the same location (sub-domain), (iii) the same material type and location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques have seen extensive use in the fluid dynamics community for the modeling of general nonlinear flows [19,20], linearized flows [21], compressible flows [22], turbulence [23,11] and other applications [24,25]. Naturally the same techniques also have a wide range of applicability in the development of ROMs for particle transport, and have been used to model linear particle transport problems [26,27,28,29,30,31], neutron transport in reactor-physics problems [32,33,34], and nonlinear radiative transfer [35,36,37,38,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%