2011 16th International Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1109/transducers.2011.5969203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reel-to-reel compatible printed accelerometer

Abstract: This paper describes the fabrication and testing of a one-axis polymer-based capacitive accelerometer made using a reel-to-reel/roll-to-roll compatible, printing-based process. The accelerometer is a suspended parallel-plate sense capacitor made from a laser-printed polystyrene composite material on a flexible plastic substrate. With a simple analog voltage readout circuit, device sensitivity is 58mV/g with +/-1.5g range. This device demonstrates fabrication of ultra-low-cost MEMS sensors on flexible polymer s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MEMS-based accelerometers have many attractive attributes, such as a tiny footprint, high sensitivity, low power consumption, high reliability, and multiple functionalities. However, future advances will be limited by drawbacks of complex, expensive, and time-consuming fabrication processes . Moreover, these processes are limited by the 2D planar dimensionality of the microfabrication processes, are not flexible, and cannot be easily customized or modified with new designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MEMS-based accelerometers have many attractive attributes, such as a tiny footprint, high sensitivity, low power consumption, high reliability, and multiple functionalities. However, future advances will be limited by drawbacks of complex, expensive, and time-consuming fabrication processes . Moreover, these processes are limited by the 2D planar dimensionality of the microfabrication processes, are not flexible, and cannot be easily customized or modified with new designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, future advances will be limited by drawbacks of complex, expensive, and time-consuming fabrication processes. 12 Moreover, these processes are limited by the 2D planar dimensionality of the microfabrication processes, are not flexible, and cannot be easily customized or modified with new designs. The established micromachining techniques lack the ability to easily fabricate complex three-dimensional structures and have limited compatibility with unconventional flexible substrates and non-solid-state proof masses.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%