2009
DOI: 10.1177/0267658309349435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A referential/quantified asymmetry in the second language acquisition of English reflexives by Chinese-speaking learners

Abstract: There has been considerable research that investigates whether reflexives in interlanguage grammars (ILGs) are constrained by Principle A of the Binding Theory. These earlier studies focused on the role of sentence type, including both finite and non-finite test sentences; they did not examine the role of antecedent type, namely distinguishing between quantified antecedents and referential antecedents in the test sentences. This study explores Chinese learners' acquisition of the locality constraints on the bi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our examination of the acquisition of locality constraints we took into consideration the possibility that Korean speakers could be influenced by the interaction between locality and clausal syntactic properties (finite or non-finite) and that learners' choices may be influenced by properties which are specific to each of these two clause structures Finer & Broselow (1986), Finer (1991, Matsumura (1994), Akiyama (2002) andJiang (2009). For instance, Finer & Broselow (1986) briefly explain how participants may have analysed the non-finite clauses as mono-clauses, so they may have treated the first NP as a subject and the second NP as an object.…”
Section: Individual Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our examination of the acquisition of locality constraints we took into consideration the possibility that Korean speakers could be influenced by the interaction between locality and clausal syntactic properties (finite or non-finite) and that learners' choices may be influenced by properties which are specific to each of these two clause structures Finer & Broselow (1986), Finer (1991, Matsumura (1994), Akiyama (2002) andJiang (2009). For instance, Finer & Broselow (1986) briefly explain how participants may have analysed the non-finite clauses as mono-clauses, so they may have treated the first NP as a subject and the second NP as an object.…”
Section: Individual Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BT has subsequently been of central importance in developing our understanding of the specific role played by UG in the acquisition of non-native grammars (e.g. Finer & Broselow 1986;Hirakawa 1990;Finer 1991;Bennett 1994;Eckman 1994;Lakshmanan & Teranishi 1994;Thomas 1989Thomas , 1991Thomas , 1995White 1995;Wakabayashi 1996;Bennett & Progovac 1998;MacLaughlin 1998;Yip & Tang 1998;Yuan 1998;Ying 1999;Jiang 2009). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eckman, 1994; Finer & Broselow, 1986; Hirakawa, 1990; Thomas, 1989, 1991) are concerned with the ability of speakers of languages which allow the marked value (e) of the GCP to acquire the binding setting, or concerned with the ability of speakers of languages that allow the unmarked value (a) of the GCP in order to establish whether or not L2 learners have access to UG. The acquisition is mostly concerned with English reflexives by native Japanese speakers (Hirakawa, 1990; Wakabayashi, 1996), Chinese (Jiang, 2009) or native Korean speakers (Finer & Broselow, 1986). These empirical studies lead to optionality which the parameterized approach fails to account for.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers (e.g. Akiyama, 2002; Jiang, 2009) examine locality instantiated in biclausal sentences with finite and nonfinite clauses, trying to address the issue of whether L2 learners have access to the principles and parameters of Universal Grammar (UG).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants judged whether the sentence was true or false in the context of the picture. Use of a picture instead of a story to present the context ensures that participants understand the context; another approach is to present the story context in the learners’ L1, as was done, for example, in Jiang (2009), another study that used a TVJT to study anaphor binding in L2 acquisition.…”
Section: Interpretation Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%