2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.04.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reformulation of the conservative level set reinitialization equation for accurate and robust simulation of complex multiphase flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Otherwise, some error indicators for the coarser mesh ( δ = 2) suggest that this characteristic element length is not sufficient to reach minimum size for a competent usage of reinitialization tools in long‐term calculations. Responses of very HO schemes for this test reveal that the intermediate grid size ( δ = 22) is sufficient to achieve same order of errors as the high order scheme in the work of Chiodi and Desjardins with the coarse mesh ( δ = 2).…”
Section: Numerical Testsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Otherwise, some error indicators for the coarser mesh ( δ = 2) suggest that this characteristic element length is not sufficient to reach minimum size for a competent usage of reinitialization tools in long‐term calculations. Responses of very HO schemes for this test reveal that the intermediate grid size ( δ = 22) is sufficient to achieve same order of errors as the high order scheme in the work of Chiodi and Desjardins with the coarse mesh ( δ = 2).…”
Section: Numerical Testsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…As a result, oscillations of the phase function appear during reinitialization . Several procedures were proposed to alleviate spurious values during reinitialization as, for instance, use of fast marching methods combined with remapping of compressive fluxes and a modified reinitialization equation (eg, see the work of Chiodi and Desjardins and references therein). To get rid of these wiggles, a simple approach is proposed to complement a reinitialization process.…”
Section: A Conservative Flux‐corrected Finite Element Methods For Intementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even though the 3D and 2D cases cannot be directly compared, it suggests that the model could be improved to obtain a better mass conservation. Moreover, there is a broad scientific literature on the implementation of conservative advection schemes for the Level-Set method (e.g., Kees et al, 2011;Owkes and Desjardins, 2013;Chiodi and Desjardins, 2017), that could benefit to the mass conservation capacity of our model in the future.…”
Section: Mass Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%