1996
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0434(1996)011<0521:armiua>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Regional Model Intercomparison Using a Case of Explosive Oceanic Cyclogenesis

Abstract: The authors evaluate the performance of current regional models in an intercomparison project for a case of explosive secondary marine cyclogenesis occurring during the Canadian Atlantic Storms Project and the Genesis of Atlantic Lows Experiment of 1986. Several systematic errors are found that have been identified in the refereed literature in prior years. There is a high (low) sea level pressure bias and a cold (warm) tropospheric temperature error in the oceanic (continental) regions. Though individual mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike primary cyclones, secondary+ cyclones (Figure c) have a tendency to form in the central North Atlantic. There is also a substantial amount of secondary+ cyclogenesis near the coast of North America, which may be related to processes such as coastal frontogenesis (Bosart, ; Nielsen, ; Gyakum et al ., ) or cold air damming. This difference in the genesis density of secondary+ and primary cyclones, with secondary+ cyclones tending to form further downstream, can be understood as follows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike primary cyclones, secondary+ cyclones (Figure c) have a tendency to form in the central North Atlantic. There is also a substantial amount of secondary+ cyclogenesis near the coast of North America, which may be related to processes such as coastal frontogenesis (Bosart, ; Nielsen, ; Gyakum et al ., ) or cold air damming. This difference in the genesis density of secondary+ and primary cyclones, with secondary+ cyclones tending to form further downstream, can be understood as follows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.) A typical S1 score for a short-term forecast ranges between 20 and 40 and tends to decrease with height (Gyakum et al 1996). For the initial period of 8-11 March, this score remains between 20 and 30, which indicates that this event may have been unusually predictable.…”
Section: Fig 2 Model Integration Domain (Fullmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As 00h da simulação (Figura Neto, 1996;Rocha, 2000), assim como de vários outros modelos regionais estudados por Gyakum et al (1996). Estes estudos não abordaram os motivos para as tendências sistemáticas apresentadas pelos modelos regionais, mas Gyakum et al (1996) (Figura 2d).…”
Section: Experimento De Controleunclassified