2022
DOI: 10.1002/jae.2899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A regularization approach to common correlated effects estimation

Abstract: Summary Cross‐section average‐augmented panel regressions introduced by Pesaran (2006) have been a popular empirical tool to estimate panel data models with common factors. However, the corresponding common correlated effects (CCEs) estimator can be sensitive to the number of cross‐section averages used and/or the static factor representation for observables. In this paper, we show that most of the corresponding problems documented in the literature can be solved once cross‐section averages are appropriately r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this aim, we used three different estimators which consider CSD. These estimators are the Augmented Mean Group estimator (AMG) developed by Eberhardt and Teal (2010), the dynamic common correlated effects estimator (DCCE) by Chudik and Pesaran (2015), and the regularized CCE estimator (rCCE) by Juodis (2022). Table 5 includes panel long‐run estimation results.…”
Section: Methodology and Empirical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this aim, we used three different estimators which consider CSD. These estimators are the Augmented Mean Group estimator (AMG) developed by Eberhardt and Teal (2010), the dynamic common correlated effects estimator (DCCE) by Chudik and Pesaran (2015), and the regularized CCE estimator (rCCE) by Juodis (2022). Table 5 includes panel long‐run estimation results.…”
Section: Methodology and Empirical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will come back to this estimator in Section 4, where we discuss it in detail. Since its introduction, the CCE estimator has become a standard tool in panel data econometrics, giving rise to a whole new strand of the literature with numerous extensions such as Kapetanios et al (2011), Chudik et al (2011), Pesaran and Tosetti (2011), Chudik and Pesaran (2015), Westerlund (2018), Westerlund et al (2019), Juodis et al (2021) and Juodis (2021) to name just a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FollowingPesaran (2007), we included CSAs of one-period lagged level and the first difference of co2, fd, gdp, and TB in the equation. Then, we excluded statistically insignificant CSAs to increase the efficiency of the estimates, as the number of time series observations is not large, following the suggestion byJuodis (2022). Table8documents the results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%