1982
DOI: 10.1002/bbpc.19820861011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Reinvestigation of the Effect of Pressure on the Reaction of Fe(III) with Thiocyanate Ions in Aqueous Solution

Abstract: The effect of pressure on the reaction between Fe(III) and NCS− ions was reinvestigated using a recently constructed high‐pressure Joule‐heating temperature‐jump instrument. The results differ significantly from those reported by Jost [1], and the volumes of activation for the reactions of Fe(OH2)63+ and Fe(OH2)5OH2+ with NCS− are 6.7 ± 0.4 and ∼0 cm3 mol−1, respectively, at 20°C. The pressure dependences of the Fe(OH2)33+/Fe(OH2)5OH2+ and Fe(OH2)63+, NCS−/Fe(OH2)5NCS2+ equilibria are in good agreement with ea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose to obtain the value of k by measuring the increase in time of the maximum product concentration and comparing the numerics and experiments. This fit (shown in the Supporting Information) yields k ∼ 3 × 10 4 M −3 ·s −1 , with an uncertainty of 20%. This value of k is used to calculate the variables τ = 200 μs and L = 0.5 μm, in order to rescale the dimensionless solution onto dimensional variables and compare with the experimentally measured profiles. This comparison is shown in Figure , where the theoretical and experimental concentration profiles are superimposed for four discrete times.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose to obtain the value of k by measuring the increase in time of the maximum product concentration and comparing the numerics and experiments. This fit (shown in the Supporting Information) yields k ∼ 3 × 10 4 M −3 ·s −1 , with an uncertainty of 20%. This value of k is used to calculate the variables τ = 200 μs and L = 0.5 μm, in order to rescale the dimensionless solution onto dimensional variables and compare with the experimentally measured profiles. This comparison is shown in Figure , where the theoretical and experimental concentration profiles are superimposed for four discrete times.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%