A relational perspective on the dynamics of the organic sector in Austria, Italy, and France

Abstract

Despite a common legal framework at EU-level, organic farming has developed differently in Member States. Previous analyses showed the influence of various factors on the development of the organic sector, including public policies, discourses, and marketing channels. Building on a relational perspective, we propose a conceptual framework that provides a situated understanding of national trajectories. We argue that the organic sector emerges based on relations between organic actors, policymakers, mainstream farmers associations, advocacy groups, and actors along the food chain. Based on these relations, we analyse the development of the organic sector in Austria, Italy, and France. We show that its dynamics result from a complex and evolving intertwining of relations over time. These dynamics are unpredictable, as they depend on whether and how actors can build and maintain relations between organic agriculture and broader issues in the agrifood system, such as the maintenance of family farms, environmental protection, gastronomic heritage, fairness in the food chain, or export promotion. The relational perspective highlights the historicity of relations, as well as the extent to which relations are influenced by the temporal and the spatial context. By framing the agrifood system as an ensemble of emergent social practices rather than a field of invariant logic and automatic unfoldings, the relational perspective emphasises the importance of seizing windows of opportunity, and the role of creativity in actions.

A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations

“…However, while such efforts have powerfully highlighted the complex spatial webs of interdependence that characterize human-nature connectedness and influence governance outcomes, they have placed less emphasis on the dynamic temporal processes that (re)produce network configurations, and have so far tended to stay within substantialist understandings of distinct social and ecological nodes (Sayles et al 2019). Meanwhile, in parallel development, others have drawn on Emirbayer's work, along with Latour (2005), Dépelteau (2018), Deleuze and Guattari (1988), and others, to develop rich conceptual and qualitative accounts of human-nature connectedness from 'deep' relational perspectives that collapse distinctions between 'human' and 'natural' entities, for instance in relation to farms and farmers (Darnhofer et al 2016;Darnhofer 2020) and agricultural systems more generally (Dwiartama and Rosin 2014; Darnhofer et al 2019). Bringing together the quantitative, spatial emphasis of network analysis with the conceptual development of the latter studies is a promising research pathway for sustainability science (Lejano 2019;Sayles et al 2019).…”

A Participatory Analysis of the Control and Certification System in the Italian Organic Rice Value Chain

“…Darnhofer et al [21] argued that the organic sector emerged based on relations between organic actors, policymakers, mainstream farmers associations, advocacy groups, and actors along the food chain. These relations depend on the temporal and the spatial context.…”

“…The affirmation of an alternative certification movement that is parallel to the conventional one also occurs in Europe, where several examples [20][21][22] documented the need for a system of compliance with organic principles based on relationships of trust, shared values, and commitment between different actors in the supply chain, in addition to or in place of the conventional certification system.…”

The Relational Approach and Social Epistemology in Educational Leadership: A Rejoinder

“…The relational approach is not grounded in the orthodox literatures of educational administration and leadership. This is why the work can find a home in sociological texts (e.g., Dépelteau, 2018) and is cited in diverse fields such as politics (Pan, 2018), rural studies (Darnhofer, D'Amico, & Fouilleux, 2019), and language and literature (Hasegawa, 2019) in addition to educational leadership. It is therefore not surprising to see Bogotch, Bauer and Su-Keene note:…”