1998
DOI: 10.1109/18.669289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reliability output Viterbi algorithm with applications to hybrid ARQ

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Information feedback of the symbol posterior probabilities, obtained from the BCJR algorithm [23], determines subsequent transmissions, as in [20]. Raghavan and Baum [24] and Fricke and Hoeher [19], [25], [26] present reliability-based type-I HARQ schemes using terminated CCs in a VLF decisionfeedback setting. In [19], the reliability-based scheme is also compared to a code-based scheme using CRCs for error detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information feedback of the symbol posterior probabilities, obtained from the BCJR algorithm [23], determines subsequent transmissions, as in [20]. Raghavan and Baum [24] and Fricke and Hoeher [19], [25], [26] present reliability-based type-I HARQ schemes using terminated CCs in a VLF decisionfeedback setting. In [19], the reliability-based scheme is also compared to a code-based scheme using CRCs for error detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(22)]. • There are some improved algorithms (with higher complexity) of the Yamamoto-Itoh algorithm, [27], with respect to the error exponent, [17], [18], however for the purpose of analyzing performance (bit error probability and retransmission probability as functions of E c /N 0 and γ) in this paper, it is hard to know whether these algorithms are better than the Yamamoto-Itoh algorithm or not. For example, if we assume that…”
Section: B Decoding Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the original objective of erasure decoding is to keep the computational requirements of decoding as small as possible while making the error probability small, if the computational requirements of the decision criterion are large this defeats the purpose. Therefore, it is possible to regard the schemes presented by Raghavan and Baum [9] and Hashimoto [3] that attempt to minimize the probability of a resend based on a fixed decoding error and the decision feedback scheme of Yamamoto and Itoh [1] as efficient in practice.…”
Section: The Decision Criterion Used In Yamamoto and Itoh's Decision mentioning
confidence: 99%