2015
DOI: 10.1515/cmam-2015-0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Reliable Residual Based A Posteriori Error Estimator for a Quadratic Finite Element Method for the Elliptic Obstacle Problem

Abstract: A residual based a posteriori error estimator is derived for a quadratic finite element method (fem) for the elliptic obstacle problem. The error estimator involves various residuals consisting the data of the problem, discrete solution and a Lagrange multiplier related to the obstacle constraint. A priori error estimates for the Lagrange multiplier have been derived and further under an assumption that the contact set does not degenerate to a curve in any part of the domain, optimal order a priori error estim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there is a substantial literature on the a posteriori error analysis of finite element methods for second order obstacle problems (cf. [30,19,37,34,2,35,36,7,6,27,28,18] and the references therein), as far as we know this is the first paper on the a posteriori error analysis for the displacement obstacle problem of Kirchhoff plates. We note that there is a fundamental difference between second order and fourth order obstacle problems, namely that the Lagrange multipliers for the fourth order discrete obstacle problems can be represented naturally as sums of Dirac point measures (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While there is a substantial literature on the a posteriori error analysis of finite element methods for second order obstacle problems (cf. [30,19,37,34,2,35,36,7,6,27,28,18] and the references therein), as far as we know this is the first paper on the a posteriori error analysis for the displacement obstacle problem of Kirchhoff plates. We note that there is a fundamental difference between second order and fourth order obstacle problems, namely that the Lagrange multipliers for the fourth order discrete obstacle problems can be represented naturally as sums of Dirac point measures (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recently, DG methods have been applied for solving VIs, such as gradient plasticity problem [27,28], obstacle problems [29,30], Signorini problem [31,32], quasistatic contact problems [33], plate contact problem [34][35][36], two membranes problem [37] and Stokes or Navier-Stokes flows with slip boundary condition [38,39]. A posteriori error analysis of DG methods for VIs was also considered in [40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of this article is on the design and analysis of a quadratic finite element method for the three dimensional elliptic obstacle problem. The work in [12,42] and [24] is for a quadratic finite element method (FEM) for the two dimensional obstacle problem. The quadratic FEM in two dimensions is based on the discrete constraints at the midpoints of the edges of the triangles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%