“…While the proof of Lemma 1.9 is a straightforward application of the Wiener chaos estimate (Lemma 2.5), we point out that the set of probability one on which the conclusion of Lemma 1.9 holds depends on the choice of deterministic initial data (X 0 , X 1 ) ∈ H s 1 (T 3 ). This is analogous to the situation for the recent study of nonlinear dispersive PDEs with randomized initial data [14,15,60,7,80,73,74,8], where a set of probability one for local-in-time or global-in-time well-posedness depends on the choice of deterministic initial data (to which a randomization is applied). See [15] for a further discussion.…”