Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2591888.2591904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reputation based electronic government procurement model

Abstract: E-procurement systems allow governments to efficiently management their contracts by improving interactions with suppliers, and by increasing transparency. Governments generally choose their suppliers based on the minimum price. However, other criteria than price may be considered to help governments choose the best suppliers. This paper proposes a formal reputation model that is intended to determine the winners of an eprocurement process. The proposed model combines three elements: (1) the direct reputation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corruption practices in procurement processes have been extensively explored in the literature [8,39], and it has been relevant to promote standards, legislation, and enforcement mechanisms in order to prevent opportunities for behaviors such as collusion, bid-rigging, and cartel agreements [17,20,40,41], often by looking at the economic incentives and punishment rules [42,43]. Global strategies seek to increase transparency, convenience, higher revenue in procurement through electronic government procurement [2,4,44,45], and improve the value of reputation of the suppliers with compliance policies [46][47][48]. The underlying presumption seems to be that governments' purchasing decisions are influenced by legitimate concerns and governments are willing to work with firms with a reputation, where public-private partnership will be endorsed within the compliance of domestic and international legal framework and codes of ethics [9].…”
Section: Professional Practice and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corruption practices in procurement processes have been extensively explored in the literature [8,39], and it has been relevant to promote standards, legislation, and enforcement mechanisms in order to prevent opportunities for behaviors such as collusion, bid-rigging, and cartel agreements [17,20,40,41], often by looking at the economic incentives and punishment rules [42,43]. Global strategies seek to increase transparency, convenience, higher revenue in procurement through electronic government procurement [2,4,44,45], and improve the value of reputation of the suppliers with compliance policies [46][47][48]. The underlying presumption seems to be that governments' purchasing decisions are influenced by legitimate concerns and governments are willing to work with firms with a reputation, where public-private partnership will be endorsed within the compliance of domestic and international legal framework and codes of ethics [9].…”
Section: Professional Practice and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature review shows that the definition proposed by Montreuil, Meller, and Ballot in 2012 is used by subsequent researchers (Pan et al 2015). The documented research and simulations on PI consider π-containers and π-hub design (Walha et al 2016), π-containers routing (Pach et al 2014), searching the parameters that have an impact on PI effectiveness, performance measure indicators, digital system to support PI (Montreuil, Ballot, and Fontane 2012), the impact of freight transportation networks on resource sharing (Furtado and Frayret 2015), and mechanism of allocating transportation services to carriers (Klabi, Rekik, and Mellouli 2014).…”
Section: Seamless and Effective Transport Of Goodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in their paper, there is no explanation of formulating the characteristic attributes. Other studies by Heinrich (2012); Klabi, Mellouli, & Rekik (2013) discussed communication while negotiating as a vital part of deducing a vendor's reputation.…”
Section: Figure 2 2 E-purchasing Transaction Historymentioning
confidence: 99%