2004
DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.02.335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Retrospective Case Series Describing the Injury Pattern of the Advanced M26 TASER in Multnomah County, Oregon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the studies by Hall et al and McManus et al [24,25] this gives a total of 4,387. The number of chest exposures is not clear given the information in the papers or abstracts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…With the studies by Hall et al and McManus et al [24,25] this gives a total of 4,387. The number of chest exposures is not clear given the information in the papers or abstracts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The human experimental findings are supported by field use studies (3,188 uses in five studies) that have not demonstrated sudden ventricular dysrhythmias associated with the use of the devices. [27][28][29][30][31] In the study by Bozeman et al,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amnesty Internawww.elsevier.com/locate/forsciint Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Forensic Science International 176 (2008) [253][254][255][256][257] tional claims that these weapons have been responsible for 230 such deaths [2]. While much of the previous research and field data has supported the assertion that these weapons do not cause instantaneous malignant cardiac arrhythmias from the electrical discharge, this is still an area of controversy [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. In addition, there have been claims that this discharge may lead to other effects which can lead to delayed cardiovascular collapse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%