2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-0899-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A retrospective population-based study of induction of labour trends and associated factors among aboriginal and non-aboriginal mothers in the northern territory between 2001 and 2012

Abstract: BackgroundInduction of labour (IOL) has become more common among many populations, but the trends and drivers of IOL in the Northern Territory (NT) of Australia are not known. This study investigated trends in IOL and associated factors among NT Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal mothers between 2001 and 2012.MethodsA retrospective analysis of all NT resident women who birthed in the NT between 2001 and 2012 at ≥32 weeks gestation. Demographic, medical and obstetric data were obtained from the NT Midwives’ Collecti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This category includes stillbirth that has been attributed to malpresentation, forceps delivery, vacuum delivery, cesarean delivery or induction of labor. This is in agreement with a population‐based study from the Northern Territory, Australia which demonstrated higher rates of emergency caesarean and malpresentation in Indigenous mothers compared to non‐Indigenous, 60 but contrary to the study by Kildea and colleagues who found Indigenous Australian to have lower rates of instrumental delivery and induction of labor 61 . In our review, Asian and South Asian ethnicities showed a larger proportion of stillbirths attributed to complications of placenta, cord and membranes, in line with previous work showing higher rates of placental insufficiency 62 and placenta praevia 63 in women of Asian heritage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This category includes stillbirth that has been attributed to malpresentation, forceps delivery, vacuum delivery, cesarean delivery or induction of labor. This is in agreement with a population‐based study from the Northern Territory, Australia which demonstrated higher rates of emergency caesarean and malpresentation in Indigenous mothers compared to non‐Indigenous, 60 but contrary to the study by Kildea and colleagues who found Indigenous Australian to have lower rates of instrumental delivery and induction of labor 61 . In our review, Asian and South Asian ethnicities showed a larger proportion of stillbirths attributed to complications of placenta, cord and membranes, in line with previous work showing higher rates of placental insufficiency 62 and placenta praevia 63 in women of Asian heritage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This category includes stillbirth that has been attributed to malpresentation, forceps delivery, vacuum delivery, caesarean delivery or induction of labour. This is in agreement with a population-based study from the Northern Territory, Australia which demonstrated higher rates of emergency caesarean and malpresentation in Indigenous mothers compared to non-Indigenous, 60 but contrary to the study by Kildea and colleagues who found Indigenous Australian to have lower rates of instrumental delivery and induction of labour. 61 In our review, Asian and South Asian ethnicities showed a larger proportion of stillbirths attributed to complications of placenta, cord and membranes, in line with previous work showing higher rates of placental insufficiency 62 and placenta praevia 63 in women of Asian heritage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%