“…While this is a potential source of error, it also may not be such a bad assumption: where there are chronological controls on ice-stream reorganization, these have not been noted to change the continentalscale structure of ice divides (e.g., Stokes et al, 2009;Ross et al, 2009;Ó Cofaigh et al, 2010). Better chronologies often come from direct dating of ice-marginal positions (e.g., Licciardi et al, 1999;Dyke, 2004;Gowan, 2013), fluvial deposits (e.g., Bretz, 1969;Atwater, 1984;Ridge, 1997;Benito and O'Connor, 2003;Knox, 2007;Rittenour et al, 2007), and lacustrine deposits (e.g., Antevs, 1922;Kehew and Teller, 1994;Rayburn et al, 2005Rayburn et al, , 2007Rayburn et al, , 2011Richard and Occhietti, 2005;Breckenridge, 2007;Breckenridge et al, 2012) and these provide the fourth layer to define drainage chronologies. The fifth layer of data comes from the offshore stratigraphic record (e.g., Leventer et al, 1982;Andrews and Tedesco, 1992;Andrews et al, 1999;Flower et al, 2004;Carlson et al, 2007aWilliams et al, 2012;Maccali et al, 2013), which can be compiled into paleohydrographs that may correlate with time-variable drainage basin area , but outside of some information on provenance (Carlson et al, 2007a, it cannot independently indicate where the past drainage basin margins lie.…”