2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review article on factors affecting bone loss in dental implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, previous studies have generally considered only a static masticatory load, [37,[74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82]. However, in addition to static load, the current study considered quasistatic and dynamic loading rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, previous studies have generally considered only a static masticatory load, [37,[74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82]. However, in addition to static load, the current study considered quasistatic and dynamic loading rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precision, efficacy and longevity of functional rehabilitation of jaws are dependent on both primary mechanical stability of a dental implant and osseointergration. The position and angulation of a dental implant determines the stress distribution pattern for a given load around it which over a period of time determines the pattern of bone resorption around it and hence the stability of an implant [7] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most previous studies did not consider the crown and abutment screw components of the prosthetic [34,69,71,72], and hence the clinical application of the FEA findings is somewhat limited. Furthermore, previous studies have generally considered only a static masticatory load, [34,[73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81]. However, in addition to static load, the current study considered quasi-static and dynamic loading rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%