2008
DOI: 10.1080/19315860701686963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Behavioral Interventions for Psychotic Verbal Behavior in People With Intellectual Disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No formal systematic review or meta-analysis of behavioural treatment of psychotic behaviour was identified for this review; however, Travis and Sturmey 48 conducted a review of behavioural interventions for psychotic verbal behaviour in people with DDs and identified 3 small N experiments that used nonfunction-based DR, 8 experiments using function-based interventions, and 2 experiments combining behavioural and pharmacological interventions. Subsequently, 1 study demonstrated 4-year maintenance of intervention effects.…”
Section: Applied Behaviour Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No formal systematic review or meta-analysis of behavioural treatment of psychotic behaviour was identified for this review; however, Travis and Sturmey 48 conducted a review of behavioural interventions for psychotic verbal behaviour in people with DDs and identified 3 small N experiments that used nonfunction-based DR, 8 experiments using function-based interventions, and 2 experiments combining behavioural and pharmacological interventions. Subsequently, 1 study demonstrated 4-year maintenance of intervention effects.…”
Section: Applied Behaviour Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavior analysts have demonstrated that environmental consequences may control delusional verbal behavior (Wilder & Wong, 2007). Travis and Sturmey (2008) reviewed several interventions for delusional statements in people with intellectual disabilities and found that many demonstrated that the behavior is sensitive to environmental consequences such as attention (Carr & Britton, 1999; Dixon, Benedict, & Larson, 2001; Rehfeldt & Chambers, 2003) or escape from task demands (Durand & Crimmins, 1987). There are no studies, however, on the effectiveness of a functional analysis and treatment of the delusional statements of an individual with dual diagnoses and traumatic brain damage, and no studies have reported long‐term treatment effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%