A review of children's reports of parent behaviors.

Goldin, Paul C.

doi:10.1037/h0027017

Cited by 106 publications

(44 citation statements)

References 72 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Similarly, t-tests revealed that, in general, this sample of college students perceived mothers as more accepting, caring, and protective than fathers. These findings suggest that the body of research showing that children tend to perceive mothers as more "loving" than fathers (e.g., Goldin, 1969) may also apply to late adolescence and young adulthood. Finally, significant bivariate correlations between maternal and paternal variables also revealed that student perceptions of one parent are generally consistent with perceptions of the other parent.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 77%

Parenting practices and their relation to anxiety in young adulthood

Reitman¹,

Asseff²

2010

Journal of Anxiety Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 77%

Parenting practices and their relation to anxiety in young adulthood

Reitman¹,

Asseff²

2010

Journal of Anxiety Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This reliance on student self-report data may raise concerns about the validity of these perceptions of parenting and the accuracy of retrospective alcohol use measures. Although literature exists documenting that adolescents can accurately and reliably report on their parents' practices (Goldin, 1969;Moskowitz and Schwarz, 1982) and on their own substance use behaviors (Burleson and Kaminer, 2006;Sobell and Sobell, 1997), future studies might be further strengthened by the incorporation of multiple methods of data collection (e.g., self-reports, biological markers, direct observation) and/or multiple reporters (e.g., student, parent, collateral reporters).…”

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigating Associations Between Perceived Parental Alcohol-Related Messages and College Student Drinking

Abar

Morgan²,

Small³

et al. 2012

J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. Objective: A debate remains regarding whether parents should teach their children harm-reduction tips for using alcohol while in college or whether they should maintain a zero-tolerance policy. Which type of alcohol-related communication parents should endorse is not empirically clear. The current study made use of a longitudinal measurement-burst design to examine this issue. Method: The sample consisted of 585 second-year students from a large university in the northeastern United States. Participants completed a baseline survey and 14 daily web-based surveys. Students were assessed for perceptions of parental alcohol-related messages and their own alcohol use. Multilevel models were estimated using HLM 6.04. Results: The data indicate that zero-tolerance messages appeared most protective against alcohol use and consequences. Harm-reduction messages were most risky, even when compared with mixed messages or the absence of a message. Conclusions: Findings indicate that a zero-tolerance approach was associated with safer outcomes than other messages, even if students were already using alcohol. (J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs, 73, 71-79, 2012)

show abstract

“…The test was constructed by means of standard scaling and factor analytic procedures. Validity rests on demonstrated ability of the test to discriminate among clinical groups in ways that are consistent with theory (Paitich, 1971a) and on factor composition that is consistent with previous research in family interaction (Goldin, 1969;Barry, 1970). …”

Section: Composition Of the Batterymentioning

confidence: 75%

“…Although there are many research instruments in the literature dealing with parent-child relationships (Goldin, 1969), none appears to have attained a sufficient status to justify clinical use. The present instrument, the Clarke PCR, (a 126-item questionnaire), has a rather broad standardization base in terms of social class.…”

Section: Composition Of the Batterymentioning

confidence: 99%

A comprehensive automated psychological examination and report (CAPER)

Paitich

1973

Syst. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A program is described that generates psychological reports automatically for a battery of standard measures of intelligence and personality in adults. Problems are encountered in the programming of a battery of tests that are not present in the single test automated systems that are available. The standard measures include the Raven, MMPI, and 16PF as measures of nonverbal intelligence, psychopathology and personality traits, respectively. Newly developed measures also are included, namely, a multiple choice version of the WAIS vocabulary subtest, a questionnaire dealing with family interaction, and a sexual history questionnaire. All tests are interpreted by simple procedures that involve the printing of sentences or short paragraphs when scores fall in a given range. In the case of the MMPI/the configural systems of Gilberstadt and Duker, Marks and Seeman, and the Mayo Clinic have been included. The system provides a comprehensive clinical report that seems adequate and that requires little time for a psychology staff member.

show abstract

A review of children's reports of parent behaviors.

Cited by 106 publications

References 72 publications

Parenting practices and their relation to anxiety in young adulthood

Parenting practices and their relation to anxiety in young adulthood

Investigating Associations Between Perceived Parental Alcohol-Related Messages and College Student Drinking

A comprehensive automated psychological examination and report (CAPER)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About