2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11804-016-1373-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of deepwater pipeline construction in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico–Contracts, cost, and installation methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This section lists the metrics related to evaluating the pipeline identification performance of the model, including precision, recall, AP (Average Precision), mAP@0.5, and F1. Mathematical expressions for these metrics are shown in Equations ( 3) to (7).…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This section lists the metrics related to evaluating the pipeline identification performance of the model, including precision, recall, AP (Average Precision), mAP@0.5, and F1. Mathematical expressions for these metrics are shown in Equations ( 3) to (7).…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the subsea profiling system can map the depositional structure of shallow sub-bottom layers through acoustic profile images. In addition to detecting exposed and 2 of 12 suspended pipelines, the SBP can identify buried pipelines and hence provide extensive applications in underwater pipeline surveys [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from these issues, there is the need for other monitoring methods for fault diagnosis on oil and gas assets. Significant forces may be generated on the platforms and in the connection elements by environmental conditions such as wind and waves [ 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 350 ]. The potential places where it is safe to erect such a platform structure are largely limited by these forces [ 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 ].…”
Section: Dynamic Positioning Using Sensors On Offshore Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the type of offshore platform [ 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 ], production operations [ 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 ], systems management model [ 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 ], fossil fuel deposits’ locations with historical exploration [ 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 ], etc. In the oil and gas industry, there are more challenges involving the application of offshore platforms in deep water locations [ 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 ]. These challenges include high water depths, harsh weather conditions, heavy windy conditions, and significant wave heights thus the need for risk assessments and facilities management [ 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By rough estimates, an offshore platform that weight around 30,000 t could cost around 350-500 million dollars, plus another 60-120 million dollars for three tugboats. However, there are various studies that cover the accounting and costing of oil facilities and the financial aspect of project management [240][241][242][243][244][245][246][247][248][249][250][251].…”
Section: Pricing Offshore Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%