A Review of Dental Cements

Wingo, Kipp

doi:10.1177/0898756418755339

Cited by 25 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 71 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Zinc phosphate cement has no chemical bond to dental structures and has medium compressive strength (62 to 101 MPa), low tensile strength (5 to 7 MPa), and high solubility (0.36%). After mixing, its pH is low, and about 2 and after 24 hours, it reaches 5.5 [62,63]. Despite the low pH of this cement, it has been reported that it has no irritating effect on the pulp and it is biocompatible [64].…”

Section: Semipermanent Cementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biomaterials and Biological Parameters for Fixed-Prosthetic Implant-Supported Restorations: A Review Study

Afshari

Mosaddad

Alam

et al. 2022

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Because of the increasing use of dental implants, dental practitioners should understand the treatment and nature of peri-implant diseases (PIDs). This disease is a serious problem of dentistry, regarding epidemiology and therapy. Due to the increase in the practice of implantology as well as the increased number of implants placed every year, the rate of PID has widely increased. Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis, gingivitis, and periodontitis are common clinical manifestations of the disease. PIDs are caused by chronic inflammatory processes in the tissues around an intraoral implant, with increasing incidence, and have become a health concern. Bacterial infections are involved in the pathogenesis of these diseases. The imbalance between the host response and bacterial biofilm results in tissue destruction. New challenges lie in the prevention, treatment, and diagnosis of PIDs. The aim of this overview was to focus on the nature of the disease itself, useful diagnostic criteria, common responsible bacteria, and the prosthetic effects of fixed restorations on the health of the periodontium since recognizing the parameters involved in the development of periodontal and PIDs will play a crucial role in preventing the progression and minimizing the complications of these diseases having a fixed prosthesis.

show abstract

Section: Semipermanent Cementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biomaterials and Biological Parameters for Fixed-Prosthetic Implant-Supported Restorations: A Review Study

Afshari

Mosaddad

Alam

et al. 2022

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…At the margin of the preparation, dental cement is in constant contact with saliva, a fluid containing a spectrum of proteins with different antimicrobial characteristics dissolved in water (3,4). Good dental cement must be resistant to disintegration and dissolution where a thin layer of cement may possibly be completely dissolved, creating a space susceptible to plaque accumulation and secondary caries, which, if not observed in time, leads to tooth decay, infraction of the margin of restoration, and debonding of the restoration (5)(6)(7)(8).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Numerous authors have pointed out that water may contribute to the failure of adhesive to bond with dentin (5,(9)(10)(11)(12). Solubility is therefore an im-Stomatology portant feature in the assessment of the clinical durability of dental cements, and has been the subject of numerous experimental and clinical studies (6,(10)(11)(12)(13)(14).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Solubility of Luting Cements in Different Solutions

Gavranović-Glamoč

Ajanović

Kazazić

et al. 2020

ama

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. To evaluate and compare the solubility of three luting cements in three different solutions: distilled water and artificial saliva with different pH values (7.4 and 3.0).Materials and Methods. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (GC Fuji Plus) and two resin cements (Multilink Automix and Variolink II) were used. A total of 45 specimens, 15 specimens (15x1 mm) for each cement, were prepared according to ISO standard 4049:2009. The solubility of the cements was calculated by weighing the specimens before and after immersion and desiccation. Values of solubility in water (Wsl) in microgram/mm3 for each of the five specimens were calculated using the following formula (ISO 4049:2009): Wsl=(m1-m3)∕V. The Mann-Whitney U nonparametric statistical method and Post hoc sample comparisons were applied.Results. GC Fuji Plus showed statistically significant higher solubility in comparison with Variolink II and Multilink Automix in all three solutions. In acidic artificial saliva (pH 3.0) Multilink Automix showed significantly higher values of solubility compared to Variolink II (P<0.016). By studying the effect of pH value on the solubility of GC Fuji Plus cement, significantly higher values of solubility in pH 3.0 artificial saliva were confirmed (P<0.009). The influence of the surrounding pH value on the solubility of the resin cements Multilink Automix and Variolink II was researched. No statistically significant difference was found.Conclusion. Solubility values were mainly influenced by the proportion of hydrophilic matrix, the type and composition of filler, and the pH value of the solutions.

show abstract

“…Recently, improvements in cement properties such as strength, wear resistance, marginal integrity, and esthetics have increased the use of indirect restorations (1). The main factors determining the retention and resistance of indirect crowns include (a) total occlusal convergence, (b) surface area and height, (c) surface finish or roughness, (d) intracoronal auxiliary features of preparation, (e) relative adaptation of the restoration to the abutment, (f) texture of the internal surface of the casting, (g) splinting of multiple units, (h) strength properties of the cast metal super-structure, (i) type of cement, (j) use of venting or internal casting relief, (k) variations in cement viscosity, and variations in the seating forces (1,2). Part of the clinical success of indirect restorations is related to the type of cement that is used for retention.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Resin cements were introduced to overcome the weaknesses of the conventional cements with benefits such as optimal esthetics, favorable mechanical properties, dimensional stability, micromechanical adhesion, minimal solubility, and optimal biocompatibility (9,12). Resin cements can provide a strong bond between the tooth structure and restorative materials (1). Resin cements have greater marginal integrity than glass-ionomer cements.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Final Retention of Recemented Dental Casting Luted with Different Resin Cements

Ghasemi

Haghayegh²,

Ghalesefid

2020

J Islam Dent Assoc Iran

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aim: Dislodgment of prosthetic crowns is a common occurrence. In such cases, recementation is a suitable treatment option. The aim of this study was to compare the retention in cementation and recementation using different resin cements. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro, experimental study, 40 premolars were selected (n=10). They were standardized relative to some properties and then the wax patterns were prepared and cast. After 24 h, all specimens were decemented using Instron universal testing machine. The castings were then re-cemented and stored under the same conditions. After 24 h, the cemented copings were dislodged, and the separation load was recorded. Results: The highest and the lowest mean retention values belonged to Panavia F2 and Maxcem cements in both initial cementation and recementation groups, respectively. Paired sample t-test showed a significant difference in the retention of G-CEM group between initial cementation and recementation (P=0.009). The two-factorial repeated measures ANOVA showed the significant effect of cement type on retention (P=0.009), and there was a significant difference in retention between initial cementation and recementation (P=0.006). The Tukey's HSD test revealed a significant difference in retentive strength between the Maxcem and Panavia F2 (P=0.011). The lowest mean difference was observed between Bifix SE and Maxcem groups (-16.75 kgf, P=0.89). Conclusion:The maximum and minimum mean retention values belonged to Panavia F2 cement and Maxcem in both initial cementation and recementation groups, respectively. There was a significant difference between the initial cementation and recementation in G-CEM group.

show abstract

A Review of Dental Cements

Abstract: This review provides an in-depth comparison of advantages and disadvantages of different types of dental cements as they are used for cementing base metal alloy crowns in dogs.

Cited by 25 publications

References 71 publications

Biomaterials and Biological Parameters for Fixed-Prosthetic Implant-Supported Restorations: A Review Study

Biomaterials and Biological Parameters for Fixed-Prosthetic Implant-Supported Restorations: A Review Study

Evaluation of Solubility of Luting Cements in Different Solutions

Final Retention of Recemented Dental Casting Luted with Different Resin Cements

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About