2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-2777-2_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Feature Extraction Optimization in SMS Spam Messages Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors Almeida et al [37] [38] argued that the pre-processing has weakened its effect and degrade the classification rate. However, a simulation [28] done in the same field verified that the pre-treatment of a text would amplify the detection rate in distinguishing spam messages. In addition to that, it is also proven that pre-processing has contributed 5% improvement to accuracy value in opinion mining [35].…”
Section: B the Significance Of Text Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Authors Almeida et al [37] [38] argued that the pre-processing has weakened its effect and degrade the classification rate. However, a simulation [28] done in the same field verified that the pre-treatment of a text would amplify the detection rate in distinguishing spam messages. In addition to that, it is also proven that pre-processing has contributed 5% improvement to accuracy value in opinion mining [35].…”
Section: B the Significance Of Text Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There are many research found that applied text mining in SMS spam classification [11] [28]. However, application of text mining for spam messages is not limited to SMS but also include for email, webpage, and social media platform.…”
Section: B the Significance Of Text Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research method in this study was based on a contentbased approach. Some of the previous work based on the content are: Jali (2016) carried out an analysis of the ability to control features, analyzing information, and affect circumstances in the classification of SMS spam messages [7]. Kaya and Ertuğrul (2016) have implemented a method based on local ternary patterns to extract two distinct features from SMS messages and many machine learning approaches have been applied to distinguish SMS spam [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review proves that the use of support vector machine (SVM) and Naive Bayes leads to efficient performance. Another review for SMS spam classification/filtering is presented in [8]. This review focuses on expanding the number of features used for SMS classification and considers how the number of selected features affects the rate of accuracy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%