A review of free online survey tools for undergraduate students

Abstract

Undergraduate students are often required to collect survey data as part of their studies, but they rarely receive any detailed guidance on choosing an appropriate free online survey tool. In addition, many universities do not provide undergraduate students with an institutionally supported and managed online survey tool. Because there are so many online survey services available, the lack of an institutionally managed survey tool coupled with a lack of proper guidance on their selection and use can cause a great deal of stress and possible expense to students. In order to alleviate this problem, ten prominent free online survey services were reviewed in order to give students, particularly undergraduate students in higher education, some guidance in this matter. Three essential criteria were borne in mind when evaluating the tools: ease of use; ability to export data, and; UK Data Protection Act compliance. Although this paper is predominantly focused on UK students undertaking surveys which collect data that could personally identify a respondent, conclusions are generalised to include recommendations for surveys collecting non-personally identifiable data, and for students studying outside of the UK. Based on the findings of the review, students needing to use a free online survey tool are recommended to use eSurv for all surveys, unless they are given alternative directions by academic staff or others at their institution. In addition, we further recommend that both eSurv and Quick Surveys are appropriate for surveys collecting non-personally identifiable data.

Improving Productivity by the Automation of Checking of 3D Parametric Modelling

“…The questionnaire was released before the expert interviews to enable discussion and in anticipation of a slow response. It used the eSurv platform as recommended by Farmer et al [32] between November 9 to December 9 2018, with an assurance of anonymity and compliance with GDPR.…”

The use of the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in a practice-based health discipline: Academic and student experience in paramedicine

“…An online survey method is appropriate since surveys are well-suited to studies aiming to investigate the descriptive aspect of a situation. Surveys enable the exploration of different aspects of a given situation or for hypothesis testing (Farmer et al 2016). Each of these areas has been carefully considered during the design and development of this project (Kelley et al 2003).…”

Innovation of Training Design to Increase Writing Skill of Scientific Articles for Particular Functional Civil Servants Through the “Reverse Thinking” Method

“…Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian percobaan (experiental research) dengan fokus penelitian pada JFT widyaiswara dan statistisi. (Farmer, 2016;Batubara dan Ariani, 2016;Slamet, 2016). Dengan menggunakan aplikasi ini, hasil dari tes atau kuesioner dapat dilihat dengan cepat pada saat itu juga (real time) oleh seluruh peserta.…”