2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.smhl.2021.100263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of harmonization methods for studying dietary patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As inherent in all retrospective data harmonization techniques, the two approaches presented here are also subject to limitations including the complexity and necessity of expert domain knowledge to pool data, and the possibility that, despite best efforts, some data may not be comparable across cohorts due to, for instance, gross heterogeneity in measures. When the available data are not comparable, there is risk of data loss (66). Moreover, and also inherent to data harmonization, details with regard to the observational context can get lost.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As inherent in all retrospective data harmonization techniques, the two approaches presented here are also subject to limitations including the complexity and necessity of expert domain knowledge to pool data, and the possibility that, despite best efforts, some data may not be comparable across cohorts due to, for instance, gross heterogeneity in measures. When the available data are not comparable, there is risk of data loss (66). Moreover, and also inherent to data harmonization, details with regard to the observational context can get lost.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity arises from the inherent difficulties in combining and evaluating existing evidence given the heterogeneity in the study populations and the cognitive and dietary assessment methods employed, the different diet patterns and cognitive outcomes examined, and the differential length of the follow-up or timing of outcome assessment across studies (11). Thus far, there has been a lack of standardizing dietary intake and cognitive test data prior to data analysis (12)(13)(14). This hinders the interpretation of the study results and, consequently, limits the effectiveness of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in guiding dietary recommendations (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%