1946
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1946.tb16352.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A REVIEW OF MICROCOCCUS ENTEROTOXIN FOOD POISONING

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1955
1955
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typical results obtained with some of the culture filtrates are shown in figure 4. All but one of the enterotoxigenic strains gave lines of identity with both toxins.…”
Section: Demonstration Of Antigenicitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Typical results obtained with some of the culture filtrates are shown in figure 4. All but one of the enterotoxigenic strains gave lines of identity with both toxins.…”
Section: Demonstration Of Antigenicitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It can enter as food contaminant and spread its pathogenesis. 10,11 In this case, the first step is to degrade large amount of starch which inhibits bacterial growth. In order to establish itself in this high carbohydrate content S.aureus produces several key enzymes which degrade starch one of them is α-amylase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%