2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of machine learning in processing remote sensing data for mineral exploration

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 174 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e experimentation was performed on Pavia University (PU), Pavia Center (PC), and Kennedy Space Center (KSC) datasets, and the results show that the proposed methods achieve better accuracy with low computational cost [58]. It has many applications in different fields of life like speech recognition systems, search engines, and other AI-based applications like robotics [59].…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e experimentation was performed on Pavia University (PU), Pavia Center (PC), and Kennedy Space Center (KSC) datasets, and the results show that the proposed methods achieve better accuracy with low computational cost [58]. It has many applications in different fields of life like speech recognition systems, search engines, and other AI-based applications like robotics [59].…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most challenging geological applications using remote-sensing-based satellite data is mapping lithological features, especially for large and geologically complex areas that require high-precision lithological maps [1,2]. Furthermore, the limited availability of the spatial and spectral quality of open access image data (e.g., Landsat-5 TM, Landsat-7 ETM+ (enhanced thematic mapper plus), Landsat-8 OLI (operational land imager), ASTER and Sentinel-2) is widely utilized to extract lithological [3][4][5], mineral [6,7] and structural information [8][9][10]. The majority of studies investigating the potential of remote sensing for geological mapping [4,6,[11][12][13] have been conducted over relatively small geographical areas using individual machine learning algorithms (MLAs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the limited availability of the spatial and spectral quality of open access image data (e.g., Landsat-5 TM, Landsat-7 ETM+ (enhanced thematic mapper plus), Landsat-8 OLI (operational land imager), ASTER and Sentinel-2) is widely utilized to extract lithological [3][4][5], mineral [6,7] and structural information [8][9][10]. The majority of studies investigating the potential of remote sensing for geological mapping [4,6,[11][12][13] have been conducted over relatively small geographical areas using individual machine learning algorithms (MLAs). Therefore, an innovative approach, based on several factors, is implemented in this research to overcome the aforementioned issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, machine learning applications in remote sensing are a trending topic that is gradually gaining attention from industry experts, scientists, and researchers (Shirmard et al, 2022) due to the availability of modern techniques in remote sensing, abundant data availability, and, when compared to traditional geological mapping techniques, spatial remote sensing has indisputable benefits in terms of covered area, speed and cost (Zerrouki et al, 2019). Remote sensing technology benefits from machine learning techniques as they enable better resource management, more accurate environmental forecasts, and the discovery of novel insights from large data sets.While there are many benefits to using machine learning in remote sensing, there are some challenges as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%