2014
DOI: 10.2174/1389203715666140327114232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Methods Available to Estimate Solvent-Accessible Surface Areas of Soluble Proteins in the Folded and Unfolded States

Abstract: Solvent accessible surface area (SASA) of proteins has always been considered as a decisive factor in protein folding and stability studies. It is defined as the surface characterized around a protein by a hypothetical centre of a solvent sphere with the van der Waals contact surface of the molecule. Based on SASA values, amino acid residues of a protein can be classified as buried or exposed. There are various types of SASAs starting from relative solvent accessibility to absolute surface areas. Direct estima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
111
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 285 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 165 publications
4
111
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Obtained values agreed well with calculations by another calculation method (Cavallo et al, 2003). These and other SASA-predicting algorithms have shown accuracy and agreement in a model-independent manner for folded proteins (Ausaf Ali et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Obtained values agreed well with calculations by another calculation method (Cavallo et al, 2003). These and other SASA-predicting algorithms have shown accuracy and agreement in a model-independent manner for folded proteins (Ausaf Ali et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Solvent accessible surface area (SASA) of a protein is the area that directly interacts with its surrounding solvent [38,39]. The SASA of a protein is directly interrelated to its R g .…”
Section: Hydrogen Bonds Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the inconsequential differences of ~0.1 Å observed in the RoG estimates for the unbound and BEN‐bound systems. The restrictive effect on the conformation of the catalytic pocket was also determined by estimation of the solvent accessible surface area (SASA), which is able to predict the motion or transition of residues with respect to exposure to the protein environment from a buried hydrophobic region (Ali, Hassan, Islam, & Ahmad, ; Durham, Dorr, Woetzel, Staritzbichler, & Meiler, ; Richmond, ). As shown in Figure , while the catalytic pocket of unbound FXIIa exhibited a high surface exposure, the presence of BEN at the catalytic region retained residual orientation in the buried hydrophobic core with a considerably lower exposure to the surface region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the inconsequential differences of ~0.1 Å observed in the RoG estimates for the unbound and BEN-bound systems. The restrictive effect on the conformation of the catalytic pocket was also determined by estimation of the solvent accessible surface area (SASA), which is able to predict the motion or transition of residues with respect to exposure to the protein environment from a buried hydrophobic region (Ali, Hassan, Islam, & Ahmad, 2014;Durham, Dorr, Woetzel, Staritzbichler, & Meiler, 2009;Richmond, 1984). As shown…”
Section: Ben Elicits Catalytic Pocket Perturbation and Systematic Dmentioning
confidence: 99%