2013
DOI: 10.1080/10429247.2013.11431981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Performance Metrics for Supply Chain Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
33
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature provides hundreds of performance indicators that could be considered (Elrod et al, 2013). In this such case, variables selection can be performed by researcher's choice (Gil, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature provides hundreds of performance indicators that could be considered (Elrod et al, 2013). In this such case, variables selection can be performed by researcher's choice (Gil, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As relationships of this kind are cooperative and flexible, measures of both qualitative and quantitative should be included [15]. Appropriate supply chain measurements should be selected and assessed to ensure that outcomes and strategy are aligned and fit the industrial application [16]. To develop such a measurement system for buyer-supplier relationships, the balanced scorecard (BSC) is used [17].…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A supply chain (SC) can be defined as a network of three or more individual companies through which products flow from primary sources to end consumers (Min, Mentzer & Ladd, 2007;Elrod, Murray & Bande, 2013). Co-ordination mechanisms tend to be based on hierarchical or market relationships along the SC structure (Williamson, 1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%