2015
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1509.05169
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Proximity Effect Correction in Electron-beam Lithography

Pengcheng Li

Abstract: I review the work of proximity effect correction (PEC) in electron-beam (e-beam) lithography with emphasis on dose modification and shape modification PEC techniques.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proximity effects can be accounted and compensated for, however, it requires simulation, optimization, and verification for each single pattern, resist, and every electron beam lithography system. As our simulation suggests (Supporting Information), and from the literature, 25 it is possible to significantly reduce the PE using thinner ebeam resists. We tuned the resist thickness (for negative tone, 25−30 nm XR1541, and for positive tone 90−100 nm PMMA/AR-P 6200.04), the reactive ion etching chemistry (12.5 sccm SF 6 , 3.4 sccm O 2 , and a process pressure of ∼4 μbar), and etching power and time (50 W and 45 s), and fabricated 70−100 nm wide nanowires made out of 10−13 nm thick films.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…Proximity effects can be accounted and compensated for, however, it requires simulation, optimization, and verification for each single pattern, resist, and every electron beam lithography system. As our simulation suggests (Supporting Information), and from the literature, 25 it is possible to significantly reduce the PE using thinner ebeam resists. We tuned the resist thickness (for negative tone, 25−30 nm XR1541, and for positive tone 90−100 nm PMMA/AR-P 6200.04), the reactive ion etching chemistry (12.5 sccm SF 6 , 3.4 sccm O 2 , and a process pressure of ∼4 μbar), and etching power and time (50 W and 45 s), and fabricated 70−100 nm wide nanowires made out of 10−13 nm thick films.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…The length of the straight segments is chosen randomly based on the total cross section of elastic scattering along the trajectory. Before scattering, in correspondence to the continuously slowing down approximation, the electron energy decreases, taking into account the length of the segment and the current value of stopping power (for details see [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 24 ]).…”
Section: Theory and Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From (1), it follows that for the practical use of PF it is necessary to know the values of the parameters α, β, η. The experience of practical correction [ 10 , 13 , 14 ] and extensive simulations [ 15 , 16 , 17 ] show that the three parameters found in the experiment are in most cases quite enough to obtain the required lithography accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 With each technology node, the features on the photomask get denser and denser, which will decrease the normalized image log slope from this elevated background dose with each generation of the photomask, making them tougher and tougher to produce because the time taken to fabricate these photomasks gets longer and longer, meaning that this is becoming a significant bottleneck. 7 To alleviate this issue, one can either expose the resist using a lower acceleration voltage or design new electron beam resists that are more sensitive to the electron beam. 8 Lowering the energy of electrons will broaden the electron beam leading to larger feature sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%