2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2005.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of quartz optically stimulated luminescence characteristics and their relevance in single-aliquot regeneration dating protocols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
985
2
36

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,630 publications
(1,038 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
15
985
2
36
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, as reported by Wintle and Murray (2006) when higher doses (e.g. above 125 Gy) are employed to construct the doseeresponse curve, an additional linear component can occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, as reported by Wintle and Murray (2006) when higher doses (e.g. above 125 Gy) are employed to construct the doseeresponse curve, an additional linear component can occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Assuming an exponentially saturating growth of the signal where the luminescence intensity at dose D is a function of the maximum luminescence intensity, the radiation dose, and a characteristic dose D 0 (a parameter that describes how rapidly the signal reaches saturation), Wintle and Murray (2006) recommended 2 Â D 0 (~86% of full saturation) as an upper limit for determining meaningful equivalent doses. However, their recommendation was based only on concerns regarding precision; for higher natural doses any uncertainty in the natural luminescence signal would result in a large and asymmetric uncertainty in the interpolated equivalent dose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a). If the maximum dose which can be measured accurately equals 2D 0 (Wintle and Murray, 2006), the maximum age experimentally obtainable is about 133 ka for a dose rate of 3 Gy/ka. This suggests that only the data inside of the shaded area of Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Beyond the obvious selection of grains emitting light (here we selected grains for which the uncertainty on the first test dose signal was less than 20%, following e.g. Thomsen et al, 2003), some authors argue for strict rejection criteria (e.g., Yoshida et al, 2000;Jacobs et al, 2006, and references therein) based essentially on the response of grains to a number of quality-insurance tests of the SAR protocol, such as recycling, recuperation and IR depletion ratios (Murray and Wintle, 2000;2003;Wintle and Murray, 2006;Duller, 2003). Others have reported that the main effect of such rejection criteria is to reduce the number of selected grains with negligible effects on the estimated D e and overdispersion (OD) parameters, which might thus lead to a loss of robustness in the final results (e.g., Thomsen et al, 2012;Guérin et al, 2015a;Geach et al, 2015;Hansen et al, 2015;Kristensen et al, 2015;Zhao et al, 2015;Thomsen et al, 2016).…”
Section: Quartz Single Grain Oslmentioning
confidence: 99%