2009
DOI: 10.1080/02646830802007480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of scales to measure the mother–foetus relationship

Abstract: Research focusing on the prenatal mother-child relationship has begun to create a body of scientific knowledge. The aim of our article is to bring a selective overview of research on scales to measure the mother-foetus relationship (MFR). First, we describe the construction and available information on psychometric properties of three frequently used scales -the Maternal Foetal Attachment Scale (MFAS), Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS), Prenatal Attachment Inventory (PAI), and some other scales. Secon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
100
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
100
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This Cronbach's alpha value for the total scale concurs with previous reports in the literature (Lindgren, 2005;Muller & Ferketich, 1993;Van den Bergh & Simons, 2009). Nineteen of the 24 items in the MFAS related very well to the total scale, correlation values ranged between r = .32 and r = .66.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This Cronbach's alpha value for the total scale concurs with previous reports in the literature (Lindgren, 2005;Muller & Ferketich, 1993;Van den Bergh & Simons, 2009). Nineteen of the 24 items in the MFAS related very well to the total scale, correlation values ranged between r = .32 and r = .66.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…While theoretically linked, empirical tests of the interaction between maternalfetal attachment and maternal health behaviors in populations other than women with HIV, or in homogeneous or low-risk samples, provide mixed results (Van den Bergh & Simons, 2009). Variations in measures of maternal-fetal attachment or maternal health behaviors, definitions of key concepts, timing of assessments during pregnancy, and number or type of predictor variables may explain the inconsistencies.…”
Section: Theoretical Link Between Maternal-fetal Attachment and Healtmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Iz različnih definicij navezanosti med nosečnico in plodom pa lahko sklepamo, da so avtorji pri opredelitvi koncepta izhajali iz vedenjskega sistema skrbi (Van den Bergh in Simons, 2009;Walsh, 2010). Avtorji so navezanost med nosečnico in plodom opredeljevali s čustvi, vedenji, zaznavami in mišljenjem, ki jih bodoča mati izraža do ploda (Condon, 1993;Cranley, 1981;Müller, 1993) z namenom njegove zaščite (Shieh, Kravitz in Wang, 2001).…”
unclassified
“…In order to give professionals useful tools, it is important to develop easy-to-use measurement scales, both for research and for clinical practice in health care [1][2][3]. Validity testing of scales is an on-going process, and a variety of methodological approaches should be used in order to understand what inferences can be drawn from the scale [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%