1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.1992.tb00039.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of the Contemporary Transfer Pricing Literature with Recommendations for Future Research

Abstract: A transfer price is a value placed on the goods or services which are traded between divisions of an organization. This paper attempts to make the subject of transfer pricing accessible to researchers and others interested in managerial problems so that a very real managerial problem can be studied in a broader managerial context. The not insubstantial literature that has grown up in the transfer pricing area is reviewed and, in particular, a critical evaluation of recent writings in the field is provided. It … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The issue of cottage industries was raised throughout the interviews, but no interviewee explained speci cally how the outsourcing arrangement would deal with this issue when directives from the chief executive of cer had failed to do so. In addition, any savings that might be available through outsourcing represent a failure of the internal charging system rather than the bene ts of outsourcing per se since, theoretically, internal charges should be set at levels that motivate economic decisions about internal supply (McAulay and Tomkins, 1992;Kaplan and Atkinson, 1998;Drury, 2000). The assumptions underlying the assertions suggested by interviewee 5 are therefore at best problematic and at worst faulty.…”
Section: Costs and Other Nancial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The issue of cottage industries was raised throughout the interviews, but no interviewee explained speci cally how the outsourcing arrangement would deal with this issue when directives from the chief executive of cer had failed to do so. In addition, any savings that might be available through outsourcing represent a failure of the internal charging system rather than the bene ts of outsourcing per se since, theoretically, internal charges should be set at levels that motivate economic decisions about internal supply (McAulay and Tomkins, 1992;Kaplan and Atkinson, 1998;Drury, 2000). The assumptions underlying the assertions suggested by interviewee 5 are therefore at best problematic and at worst faulty.…”
Section: Costs and Other Nancial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There was a perception that the IS department provided a free service, despite an internal charging mechanism and this led to unrealistic demands being made for IS services. The lack of impact of the charging system was explained by the culture within the client company, which was dismissive of the 'wooden dollars' that measured the levels of charge and yet had a perceived zero sum impact on business costs (McAulay and Tomkins, 1992). The outsourcing arrangement brought in a degree of bureaucracy that created distance between users and IS providers that was absent in the relationship built upon internal charging.…”
Section: Personal Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Cost-based methods are basically internally determined using available cost data. It is conceded in the literature that these methods are subject to inherent arbitrariness in cost allocation and difficulties in determining a fair profit to add to cost (Thomas 1971;Merville and Petty 1978;MaAulay and Tomkins 1992). Because of this arbitrariness, the se methods provide more room for MNCs to pursue their corporate objectives in maximizing after-tax profits and minimizing operational risks.…”
Section: Tax Dispute Resolution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, cost allocation is relatively easy to abuse, and determining a fair profit to add to cost is difficult (MaAulay and Tomkins, 1992;Merville and Petty, 1978;Thomas, 1971). Therefore, companies can make use of cost-based method to manipulate the transfer prices and their profits.…”
Section: Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Market-based methods are based on fair market prices, which are less susceptible to manipulation. Cost-based methods are basically determined by internally generated data, and this is easier to manipulate (MaAulay and Tomkins, 1992;Merville and Petty, 1978;Thomas, 1971;Anthony and Dearden, 1980;Cook, 1995;Granick, 1975). Therefore, companies tend to use cost-based methods to manage their earnings through RPTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%