2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the literature relating to rape victim blaming: An analysis of the impact of observer and victim characteristics on attribution of blame in rape cases

Abstract: Historically

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

19
143
0
13

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
19
143
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of other forms intimate violence, it is argued that women are more likely to identify with the prototypical role of the victim than men because they are more likely to experience this type of victimisation (Dunlap et al, 2012;Herzog, 2008;Sinclair, 2012;Scott et al, 2015). Therefore, the findings for observer sex can be understood in light of women's self-protective defensive attributions in which the situation is perceived to be more serious and victims are held less responsible (Herzog, 2008;van der Bruggen & Grubb, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of other forms intimate violence, it is argued that women are more likely to identify with the prototypical role of the victim than men because they are more likely to experience this type of victimisation (Dunlap et al, 2012;Herzog, 2008;Sinclair, 2012;Scott et al, 2015). Therefore, the findings for observer sex can be understood in light of women's self-protective defensive attributions in which the situation is perceived to be more serious and victims are held less responsible (Herzog, 2008;van der Bruggen & Grubb, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Õiglase maailma hüpoteesi kohaselt usuvad inimesed üldjuhul, et mitte üksnes seksuaalvägivalla, vaid ükskõik millise kuriteo või ebaõigluse puhul on ohver olnud ise süüdi selles, mis nendega juhtunud on, mistõttu on nendega juhtunu neile vääriline "tasu" (Strömwall et al 2013;Yamawaki 2009). Teisalt on aga läbi viidud uuringuid, mille kohaselt õiglase maailma hüpotees ei mõjuta ohvrisüüdistamist kui diskursiivset praktikat (Hammond et al 2011) ning pelgalt õiglase maailma hüpotees ei suuda ohvrisüüdistamist täielikult selgitada (Bruggen & Grubb 2014;Gravelin 2018).…”
Section: Seksuaalvägivallaga Seonduvad Stereotüübidunclassified
“…Ohvriga seotud tegurite kõrval on uuritud ka kõrvalseisjaga seotud faktoreid, mis mõjutavad ohvrisüüdistamise esinemist ja ulatust (Bruggen & Grubb 2014;Franklin & Menaker 2015). Mitmed uuringud on tuvastanud, et mida lähedasem suhe on toimepanijal ohvriga olnud, seda enam süüd ohvrile omistatakse (Gravelin et al 2018;Yamawaki 2009).…”
Section: Seksuaalvägivallaga Seonduvad Stereotüübidunclassified
“…Once adopted, people are committed to these models, as seen in the defensive behaviors following just world belief violating events such as natural disasters, accidents, and criminal acts that harm innocent people. Rather than changing their belief in a just world, people often blame the victim in order to maintain their just world belief (van den Bos & Maas, 2009;van der Bruggen & Grubb, 2014).…”
Section: Physiological Responses To Belief-violating Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%