2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11029-010-9135-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the mechanical properties of isolated carbon nanotubes and carbon nanotube composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, we have computed the Young's moduli of (5,5) armchair carbon nanotubes. The predicted initial Young's moduli of nanostructures were 797 GPa, 708 GPa and 682 GPa for the pristine and the defective carbon nanotubes with one and two vacancies, respectively, which agrees well with the experimental value and other theoretical descriptions [1]. However, the numerical values were strongly dependent on the form of the assumed interatomic potential and the form of defects.…”
Section: Stress-strain Curvessupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Initially, we have computed the Young's moduli of (5,5) armchair carbon nanotubes. The predicted initial Young's moduli of nanostructures were 797 GPa, 708 GPa and 682 GPa for the pristine and the defective carbon nanotubes with one and two vacancies, respectively, which agrees well with the experimental value and other theoretical descriptions [1]. However, the numerical values were strongly dependent on the form of the assumed interatomic potential and the form of defects.…”
Section: Stress-strain Curvessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The costs of experimental measurements and uncertainty of the obtained results demand a support from the theoretical description. For example, only for Young's modulus, the reported values oscillate from 0.68 GPa to 5 TPa (e.g., [1][2][3]). Besides, theoretical calculations have predicted failure strains and failure stresses of carbon nanotubes much higher than those of the few direct mechanical measurements [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the theoretical point of view, predictive models of mechanical property for CNT reinforced polymer composites are still a current issue. In the mechanical modeling of CNTs composites many authors considered nanotubes as short "tiny" fibers [23,24]. Most of the classical approaches for short fibers reinforced polymers [25][26][27] have been used to predict strength and elastic modulus of CNTs composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical properties of CNTs have been celebrated for many years and have been the subject of hundreds of experimental and theoretical investigations, as reviewed most recently by Wang et al, 26 and Shokrieh et al 27 As is often cited, the Young's modulus and tensile strength of CNTs are five and 120 times greater, respectively, than those of 304 stainless steel. Although these simple numbers indicate that CNTs are in general mechanically robust, the mechanical properties of CNTs depend on their diameter, number of walls, and aspect ratio.…”
Section: Mechanical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%