1993
DOI: 10.1080/10413209308411306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the profile of mood states (POMS) in the prediction of athletic success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
51
1
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
51
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There is general agreement in the literature that the operational definition of success is central to any attempt to link mood scores with successful performance (Renger, 1993;Rowley et al, 1995;Terry 1995a). For POMS Meta-analysis 8 example, Rowley et al (1995) found that studies in which the categorization of performance was unclear reported larger effects than studies using clear performance criteria, although unfortunately they did not fully explain what constituted clarity in this respect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is general agreement in the literature that the operational definition of success is central to any attempt to link mood scores with successful performance (Renger, 1993;Rowley et al, 1995;Terry 1995a). For POMS Meta-analysis 8 example, Rowley et al (1995) found that studies in which the categorization of performance was unclear reported larger effects than studies using clear performance criteria, although unfortunately they did not fully explain what constituted clarity in this respect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keywords used in the computer searches included Profile of Mood States, POMS, and Mood. Manual searches were conducted through the reference lists of several comprehensive bibliographies and empirical or narrative reviews of the use of the POMS in sport (LeUnes et al, 1988; LeUnes & Berger, 1998;Renger, 1993;Rowley et al, 1995;Terry, 1995a;Vanden Auweele et al, 1993). Journal Clearly, the result of an objective summary of findings from the literature is linked directly to which studies are included in the meta-analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, there is sport achievement self-efficacy, or situational sport confidence (Lemer & Locke, 1995;Vealey, 1986;Weinberg, Gould, & Jackson, 1979;Wurtele, 1986), which is related to Bandura's (1977) self-efficacy theory. Third, there is sport performance positive and negative affectivity (Crocker & Graham, 1995a, 1995bGould, Eklund, & Jackson, 1992a, 1992bMartin & Anshel, 1995;Renger, 1993;Terry, 1995), where one's derived sense of positive and negative emotions are related to perceptions of success or failure in a given situation. Although these latter two models do include notions about a person's outcome expectancies (i.e., knowledge of the appropriate contingencies in a given situation), the emphasis is on one's situational thoughts and emotions related to perceptions of goal success and failure as being the major determinant of sport achievement behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it is difficult from the body of research to conclude even that mood and performance are closely related (see Renger, 1993;Rowley et al, 1995). It is possible however, that much of the equivocality that typifies findings in this area can be explained by methodological factors.…”
Section: Measurement Issuesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Over recent years, there has been a growing realisation that any link between athletic achievement and mood responses is probably more subtle and complex than can be explained readily by the iceberg profile. For example, narrative reviews by Renger (1993) and Terry (1995) have cast doubt on whether it is reasonable to expect mood profiles to predict athletic achievement, and a meta-analysis of pertinent studies by Rowley, Landers, Kyllo, and Etnier (1995) concluded that the iceberg profile accounted for less than 1% of the variance in performance outcome and that the "utility of the POMS in predicting athletic success is questionable" (p. 185).…”
Section: Measurement Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%