2022
DOI: 10.33256/32.3.142175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of torrent frogs ([i]Amolops[/i]: Ranidae) from Bhutan, the description of a new species, and reassessment of the taxonomic validity of some [i]A. viridimaculatus[/i] group species aided by archival DNA sequences of century-old type specimens

Abstract: Seven species of the Asian torrent frogs (genus Amolops) have previously been reported from the eastern Himalayan country of Bhutan. Species identifications from the region have been largely based on photographed animals with few voucher specimens available and no molecular sampling. Understanding the taxonomic status of Bhutan’s torrent frogs has also been hampered by the poorly understood distributional limits of species from surrounding regions. Herein we utilised molecular phylogenetic and morphological da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 ). Combining findings in this study with most recent taxonomic progress [ 5 , 13 , 35 , 36 ], we consider that so far there are 20 Amolops species known from Yunnan, accounting for the highest proportion of amphibian diversity of Yunnan (ca. 9.1%; Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…10 ). Combining findings in this study with most recent taxonomic progress [ 5 , 13 , 35 , 36 ], we consider that so far there are 20 Amolops species known from Yunnan, accounting for the highest proportion of amphibian diversity of Yunnan (ca. 9.1%; Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Measurements included: snout-vent length (SVL, from tip of snout to vent); head length (HL, from tip of snout to rear of jaws); head width (HW, width of head at its widest point); snout length (SL, from tip of snout to anterior border of eye); internarial distance (IND, distance between nares); interorbital distance (IOD, minimum distance between upper eyelids); upper eyelid width (UEW, maximum width of upper eyelid); eye diameter (ED, diameter of exposed portion of eyeball); tympanum diameter (TD, the greater of tympanum vertical and horizontal diameters); forearm and hand length (FHL, from elbow to tip of third finger); thigh length (THL, from vent to knee); tibia length (TL, from knee to heel); foot length (FL, from proximal end of inner metatarsal tubercle to tip of fourth toe); length of foot and tarsus (TFL, from tibiotarsal joint to tip of fourth toe); and horizontal diameter of digital disc of third finger (F3DSC). Comparative morphological data of congeners were taken from their original descriptions or re-descriptions [ 2 , 3 , 6 13 , 17 20 , 22 – 25 , 27 – 32 , 34 , 35 , 37 – 59 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings further support the need to prioritise future attention to the diversity and taxonomy of amphibians in the southwest border region. Although various studies have clarified the taxonomy and geographic ranges of some species, such as Amolops viridimaculatus ( Zhang et al 2021 , Mahony et al 2022 ), Limnonectes limborgi ( Huang et al 2022 ) and published a series of new recorded species, new recorded genera and new species have been discovered in border region in recent years (e.g. Yuan et al (2019) , Wu et al (2021) , Zhang et al (2022) ), Amphibian diversity still remains underrated while the taxonomy of several species, such as A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%