2010
DOI: 10.3958/059.035.0318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of U.S. and Mexican Cooperation to Develop Insect Resistance Management and Monitoring Methods for Surveying Transgenic Crops ExpressingBacillus thuringiensisProteins: 2003 to 2010

Abstract: An area-wide pink bollworm eradication program, involving growers and state and federal cooperators, has been proposed by the National Cotton Council's Pink Bollworm Action Committee. The program's objective is to eradicate the pink bollworm (PBW) from the infested areas of the U.S., essentially the southwestern portion of the Cotton Belt.Through the coordinated efforts of cotton producer communities, and federal, state, and local entities in the U.S. and Mexico, the plan is to implement the eradication progra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contrasting effect observed between hemocytes (cellular response) and PO activity (humoral response) (James and Xu, 2012) may be attributed to the physiological cost of immune regulation, similar to that reported in other Lepidoptera exposed to Bt (Caron and Myers, 2008;Gassmann et al, 2009a, b), their toxins (Carrière et al, 2010;Tamez-Guerra, 2010) or nonpathogenic bacteria (Freitak et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The contrasting effect observed between hemocytes (cellular response) and PO activity (humoral response) (James and Xu, 2012) may be attributed to the physiological cost of immune regulation, similar to that reported in other Lepidoptera exposed to Bt (Caron and Myers, 2008;Gassmann et al, 2009a, b), their toxins (Carrière et al, 2010;Tamez-Guerra, 2010) or nonpathogenic bacteria (Freitak et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Results reported by Prasifka et al (2009Prasifka et al ( , 2010, Wu et al (2009), Crespo et al (2010), Lopez et al (2010), Tamez-Guerra (2010), Pérez-Hedo et al (2011), Razze et al (2011 and Kruger et al (2012) do not provide new information that would invalidate the previous recommendations on risk mitigation made by the EFSA GMO Panel. Therefore, the EFSA GMO Panel considers that its previous conclusions on maize MON 810 remain valid and applicable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%