2020
DOI: 10.1080/19475683.2020.1791954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of urban physical environment sensing using street view imagery in public health studies

Abstract: Urban physical environments are the physical settings and built environments in neighbourhoods and cities which provide places for human activities. Evidence suggests that there are substantial associations between urban physical environments and various health outcomes, e.g. people's physical activities might be influenced by surrounding physical environments, thereby affecting their health behaviours; more exposure to urban physical environments may benefit human mental health. Street view imagery enables us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since GSV images have spatial coordinates associated with them, and can be accessed through an API, this is a potentially important approach for researchers to test and improve secondary GIS datasets. Although GSV images can be automatically downloaded, the process we have described is still reliant on manual analysis of environmental features by RAs meaning that it would be time consuming for larger projects, and potentially prone to human error [ 80 ]. While our approach is currently practical for projects and studies undertaken in a small geographic area, there is potential for scalability and replication of this approach with different datasets and different spatial contexts, or for use validating a subset of spatial data to gauge the estimated completeness and temporal validity of an overall dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since GSV images have spatial coordinates associated with them, and can be accessed through an API, this is a potentially important approach for researchers to test and improve secondary GIS datasets. Although GSV images can be automatically downloaded, the process we have described is still reliant on manual analysis of environmental features by RAs meaning that it would be time consuming for larger projects, and potentially prone to human error [ 80 ]. While our approach is currently practical for projects and studies undertaken in a small geographic area, there is potential for scalability and replication of this approach with different datasets and different spatial contexts, or for use validating a subset of spatial data to gauge the estimated completeness and temporal validity of an overall dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al recorded the underlying interface variables and walking activities of commercial streets through on-the-spot observation and taking pictures, in order to explore the influence of street visual appearance on walking activities [17]; Xiong et al took people as the core object of street evaluation, and made quantitative observation and evaluation based on people-oriented observation method on people's composition, distribution, behavior and color, so as to improve street quality [18]; Brown et al learned the influence of the building environment on physical activities through telephone interviews, questionnaires and systematic observation [20]. These studies have certain limitations in objectivity of evaluation results, large-scale refined evaluation and humanistic perspective [9,[21][22][23].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As roadsides are important public spaces in cities and important components of the urban fabric [9], many studies have constructed analytical models related to public health [10], air quality [11] and noise pollution [12] at the roadside scale. These environmental conditions play important roles in urban planning, as traffic heat emissions and carbon emissions are two of the main contributors to climate change [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%