2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00128-019-02648-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review on Adsorption Technologies for Mercury Emission Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicated that the use of a solvent-free strategy decreased unwanted blockage of functional groups in the wet impregnation process. The exposure of oxygen-containing functional groups on the biochar benefits Hg 0 , and VOC removal via adsorption over mechanochemical synthesized materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicated that the use of a solvent-free strategy decreased unwanted blockage of functional groups in the wet impregnation process. The exposure of oxygen-containing functional groups on the biochar benefits Hg 0 , and VOC removal via adsorption over mechanochemical synthesized materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first two forms of mercury can be almost completely captured through fabric filters (FF) and wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) devices respectively due to those characteristics [ 13 ]. However, conventional desulfurization and dust removal equipment cannot succeed to achieve acceptable performance in the removal of element mercury [ 14 ]. Although elemental mercury emission is a trace from the coal-fired industry, the accumulation and difficult removal properties, which are water-insoluble and volatile, have brought a worldwide threat to the biological environment and human health [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fly ash, as a byproduct of a coal-fired power plant, is also has wide sources and low cost. It is able to be a very effective adsorbent after physical and chemical modification. , The late research results showed that the physical structure and chemical composition of fly ash featured crucial influence on mercury removal, such as particle size, specific surface area, unburned carbon, , mineral composition, , and surface functional groups. , The raw fly ash has poor mercury removal performance because it is in stable physical and chemical states, while its mercury removal capability can be significantly improved after halogen modification. , Zhou et al found that the NH 4 Br chemical impregnation modified fly ash can improve its oxidation ability and promote the adsorption to Hg 0 . Zhang et al used two kinds of fly ash modified by CaCl 2 , CaBr 2 , and HBr impregnation to investigate the removal effect of mercury in an air flow reactor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is able to be a very effective adsorbent after physical and chemical modification. 8,9 The late research results showed that the physical structure and chemical composition of fly ash featured crucial influence on mercury removal, such as particle size, 10 specific surface area, 11 unburned carbon, 12,13 mineral composition, 14,15 and surface functional groups. 16,17 The raw fly ash has poor mercury removal performance because it is in stable physical and chemical states, while its mercury removal capability can be significantly improved after halogen modification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%