2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1703.07604
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on Asteroseismology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can serve as an independent constraint on the evolutionary phase of the star (e.g. Silva Aguirre et al 2013;Di Mauro 2017).…”
Section: Classical and Asteroseismic Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can serve as an independent constraint on the evolutionary phase of the star (e.g. Silva Aguirre et al 2013;Di Mauro 2017).…”
Section: Classical and Asteroseismic Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainties extend to asteroseismology (17); the calculation of luminosity variation in the search for exoplanets, and cosmological distance measures based on Cepheid variable pulsation-luminosity relations. Based on the higher opacity of iron measured on the Z facility the opacity of iron has been increased by workers modelling variable stars to explain pulsation in O and B-type stars (18,19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the findings of the Z experiments were reported an enhancement in the iron opacity has been invoked by several groups to explain pulsation in O and B-type stars [11,12]. A change in the opacity of iron has implications in asteroseismology [13] and the calculation of luminosity variation in the search for exoplanets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%