2018
DOI: 10.22159/ijap.2018v10i2.24482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review on Optimization of Drug Delivery System With Experimental Designs

Abstract: The present review article aims at determining the various possible techniques available to enhance the quality, safety and efficacy of pharmaceutical formulations by exploring most suitable and practically applicable experimental designs and optimization techniques. As we know that pharmaceutical industries are constantly in search of novel ideas to improve quality by various optimization techniques, hence in present review article we shall discuss latest optimization techniques and experimental designs to ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The developed method was optimized using response surface methodology by applying BBD and implementing the software known as Design Expert 12.0.7.0 software. The applied design matrix yield 27 experimental runs based on the conditions of parameters suggested according to Table 1, and then the obtained data are presented in Table 2, representing experimental design and its corresponding response variables (Y1, Y2, and Y3) [12,13] . Finally, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to obtain the significant difference in design matrix, and the data obtained after implementation of ANOVA are presented in Table 3.…”
Section: Methods Development and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developed method was optimized using response surface methodology by applying BBD and implementing the software known as Design Expert 12.0.7.0 software. The applied design matrix yield 27 experimental runs based on the conditions of parameters suggested according to Table 1, and then the obtained data are presented in Table 2, representing experimental design and its corresponding response variables (Y1, Y2, and Y3) [12,13] . Finally, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to obtain the significant difference in design matrix, and the data obtained after implementation of ANOVA are presented in Table 3.…”
Section: Methods Development and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficients b1, b2 and b11 were found to be significant at P<0.05; hence they were retained in the reduced model. The reduced model for time required to 80% drug release [28,29] = 409.444+ (14.167…”
Section: Preliminary Screening Of Formulation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A statistical analysis was conducted to know the optimum formulation with suitable superdisintegrant having the highest percentage of drug A polynomial regression algorithm equation was drawn by correlating the independent variables like concentration of superdisintegrants, i.e.,, starch glutamate (A), croscarmellose sodium (B), and crospovidone (C) and response variables such as dissolution efficiency in 5 min and percent dissolved in 5 min. Contour plots and surface response plots were plotted with the help of Design Expert 7.11 version software to know the interaction effects of the level of each factor in the dissolution efficiency in 5 min and percent dissolved in 5 min [4].…”
Section: Factorial Designmentioning
confidence: 99%