2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on properties of fresh and hardened geopolymer mortar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
104
0
11

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 335 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
4
104
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The most commonly used chemical activators are alkali hydroxide/silicate solutions or a combination of both. The chemical structure of fly ash geopolymers is similar to that of the zeolite except they are amorphous [27]. Geopolymerisation models have been proposed by Fernandez-Jimenez et al [30] and Duxson et al [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most commonly used chemical activators are alkali hydroxide/silicate solutions or a combination of both. The chemical structure of fly ash geopolymers is similar to that of the zeolite except they are amorphous [27]. Geopolymerisation models have been proposed by Fernandez-Jimenez et al [30] and Duxson et al [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Fly ash geopolymers are ceramic-like materials produced by the chemical activation of an aluminosilicate source such as fly ash with alkali to form a hardened binder [25][26][27][28][29]. The most commonly used chemical activators are alkali hydroxide/silicate solutions or a combination of both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geopolymers (GP) are considered a valid and sustainable alternative to OPC as they show properties suitable for diverse applications in construction [9][10][11] such as a fast setting time, low volumetric shrinkage, outstanding mechanical performance, and high resistance to chemicals and ageing [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Additionally, GP manufacture is highly cost-effective and simple, and is claimed to generate lower CO 2 emissions than OPC [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in figure 8 compressive strength of the geopolymer mortar increases with solid content of sodium hydroxide to binder ratio increasing from 0.35 to 0.59, whereas there is an decreasing tendency in compressive strength with water / binder ratio rising from 0.5 to 0.9 [9]. At steady activator to binder ratio and lime extent, expanding solid to binder proportion means expanding molarity of activator, and different specialists found that the molarity of basic arrangement affects the quality of geopolymer binder [10], [11]. observed, which demonstrates that no delaying alkaline is formed even in 16 Molarity.…”
Section: A Compressive Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%