2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on re-irradiation for recurrent and second primary head and neck cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
85
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Experienced radiotherapists who carefully followed their patients for many years find this to be an extremely rare possibility and irradiation should never be withheld from the patient for this reason. The best local control results for patients with previously irradiated recurrent head and neck cancers were reported to be with brachytherapy 30 . The reason for better local control was argued in the literature and reported that tumors with good prognostic factors (smaller tumors and oral cavity locations) were suitable for treatment with brachytherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experienced radiotherapists who carefully followed their patients for many years find this to be an extremely rare possibility and irradiation should never be withheld from the patient for this reason. The best local control results for patients with previously irradiated recurrent head and neck cancers were reported to be with brachytherapy 30 . The reason for better local control was argued in the literature and reported that tumors with good prognostic factors (smaller tumors and oral cavity locations) were suitable for treatment with brachytherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for better local control was argued in the literature and reported that tumors with good prognostic factors (smaller tumors and oral cavity locations) were suitable for treatment with brachytherapy. Moreover, higher radiation dose could be delivered by brachytherapy 30 . Our patient was previously received high-dose external beam radiation, tumor and we decided to deliver reirradiation with brachytherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, complications of therapy such as xerostomia, dysphagia, and osteoradionecrosis can still adversely affect the QOL of long-term survivors. Despite these technological advances, approximately 30-83% of these patients still die due to persistent disease, locoregional recurrence, or second primary tumor, 21,37,39,57 hence local control of HNC continues to be a therapeutic challenge.…”
Section: -50%mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of adjuvant therapy depends on a number of risk factors. Re-irradiation with or without chemotherapy is commonly reserved for inoperable recurrent locally advanced disease; as an adjunct or palliative treatment, this strategy is the only technique that may achieve long-term loco-regional Management of the N0 neck in recurrent laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma control and possibly prolong survival (15). Although a relatively high incidence of treatment-related complications has been reported, re-irradiation should be considered for patients in whom salvage surgery is not feasible (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Re-irradiation with or without chemotherapy is commonly reserved for inoperable recurrent locally advanced disease; as an adjunct or palliative treatment, this strategy is the only technique that may achieve long-term loco-regional Management of the N0 neck in recurrent laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma control and possibly prolong survival (15). Although a relatively high incidence of treatment-related complications has been reported, re-irradiation should be considered for patients in whom salvage surgery is not feasible (15). Therefore, re-irradiation with concurrent systemic therapy is recommended when: i) The sites of recurrence are not resectable; ii) the surgical margins are positive in the primary surgery; and iii) the patient has not previously undergone radiotherapy and their general condition is suitable for radiotherapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%