2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.entcs.2012.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rewriting-Based Model Checker for the Linear Temporal Logic of Rewriting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can distinguish two main camps in temporal logic and model checking [5]: the state-based approach, in which all atoms in formulas are state predicates (e.g., LTL, CTL, and CTL * [6]); and the event-based approach, where the formulas' atoms are actions or events (e.g., A-CTL [7]). At the semantic level, state based formulas are evaluated on Kripke structures, whereas action-based formulas are evaluated on labeled transition systems.…”
Section: Our Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can distinguish two main camps in temporal logic and model checking [5]: the state-based approach, in which all atoms in formulas are state predicates (e.g., LTL, CTL, and CTL * [6]); and the event-based approach, where the formulas' atoms are actions or events (e.g., A-CTL [7]). At the semantic level, state based formulas are evaluated on Kripke structures, whereas action-based formulas are evaluated on labeled transition systems.…”
Section: Our Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The papers [6,3,4,5] are all related to model checking Maude modules with LTLR formulas. The logic LTLR is the linear sublogic of TLR*, that is, formulas with no path quantifiers taken to be universally quantified on paths.…”
Section: Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6] the authors implement a translation, already described in [21], that allows the use of Maude's LTL model checker. The idea is the following: We are given a rewriting system R, with an initial state on it, and an LTLR formula as parameters to perform model checking on them.…”
Section: Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recall that the state of the system under study is described by the state vector X = (X1, ..., Xn), with state space D = D1 ×⋯× Dn ⊆ R n , where each variable Xi ∈ Di ⊆ R. Given, a model (M, G, V), SSTL formulae are evaluated over real valued traces ⃗ x ∶ T×L → D, generated by simulating the model 3 , where T is the time set and L is the set of locations. We write …”
Section: Signal Spatio-temporal Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While spatial and spatio-temporal logics have been proposed and theoretically investigated in literature [1], model checking routines have a much more recent history. Relevant works are those on spatial logics for process algebra with locations as [12,30], or spatial logic for rewrite theories [3]. Other relevant literature on purely spatial logic is [13,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%