2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2006.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rewriting logic framework for operational semantics of membrane systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we compare the operational semantics proposed in [4,7,9], adapted here to describe P systems defined as follows.…”
Section: Operational Semantics In Membrane Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section we compare the operational semantics proposed in [4,7,9], adapted here to describe P systems defined as follows.…”
Section: Operational Semantics In Membrane Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SOS approach offers several advantages (see also [1]): it makes easier defining the semantics of a systems in terms of the semantics of its components, it makes easier proving properties of the semantics of a system by induction, and offers the possibility to prove some results on the semantics (such as congruence results for behavioural equivalences) simply by ensuring that the given inference rules satisfy some requirements (or formats). Operational semantics for P systems which follow the SOS approach have been defined in [3,4,12,9,10,7,8] with different aims. In [3,4,12] Andrei, Ciobanu and Lucanu proposed a semantics mainly aimed at developing a provably correct interpreter for P systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An operational semantics for P systems with maximal parallelism semantics has been defined for P systems in [1,2,10]. The main difference w.r.t.…”
Section: Definition 8 a Partial Configuration Of π Is A Tuplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference w.r.t. our approach is concerned with the fact that, while in this Section a maximal parallelism computational step is defined as a maximal sequence of reactions, in [1,2,10] no notion of reaction is provided, and the notion equivalent to the maximal parallelism computational step is defined directly by SOS rules [25]. A detailed comparison of the two approaches is beyond the scope of the present paper and deserves further investigation.…”
Section: Definition 8 a Partial Configuration Of π Is A Tuplementioning
confidence: 99%