1987
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90037-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rigid-body method for finding centers of rotation and angular displacements of planar joint motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The condition that needs to be fulfilled when following this method is that the studied joint is a planar mechanism operating over the plane scanned. A non-planar movement causes a virtual deformation of the rotating bone(s) and alters the reference coordinates used for estimating the joint centre of rotation, thus introducing errors in its estimated position (Panjabi and Goel 1982;Spiegelman and Woo 1987). Notwithstanding this limitation, the COR method is applicable under in vivo conditions and has often been applied for estimating the lengths of human muscle-tendon moment arms (e.g.…”
Section: Methods Of Moment Arm Length Estimationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The condition that needs to be fulfilled when following this method is that the studied joint is a planar mechanism operating over the plane scanned. A non-planar movement causes a virtual deformation of the rotating bone(s) and alters the reference coordinates used for estimating the joint centre of rotation, thus introducing errors in its estimated position (Panjabi and Goel 1982;Spiegelman and Woo 1987). Notwithstanding this limitation, the COR method is applicable under in vivo conditions and has often been applied for estimating the lengths of human muscle-tendon moment arms (e.g.…”
Section: Methods Of Moment Arm Length Estimationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The axis of rotation was calculated for each joint using rigid body techniques (Spiegelman and Woo 1987) applied to vertebral position data digitized at five points over the entire range of vertebral movement observed in the three cats during voluntary head-tracking movements. Head tracking was characterized by aligning the computer model to the cats' vertebral alignment observed in the videofluoroscopic recordings during the tracking movement.…”
Section: Biomechanical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to identifying the ICR, where three images are required, the location of the GCFC requires only one image, at the knee joint angle where d is required. This eliminates several potential errors introduced by inappropriate selection of rotation angles and reference landmarks on the rotationary segment in the estimation of the ICR (Panjabi et al 1982a, b;Spiegelman and Woo 1987). However, it should be considered that the knee joint does not rotate about the GCFC at extremely extended angles where the non-circular part of the femoral condyles come into contact with the tibia plateau (Churchill et al 1998;Eckhoff et al 2001;Freeman and Pinskerova 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%