2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A risk-based framework for Measurement, Monitoring and Verification (MMV) of the Goldeneye storage complex for the Peterhead CCS project, UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This ambitious but successful experiment demonstrated the ability to monitor and quantify the integrity of offshore Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) reservoirs through detecting and measuring the chemical signature of a simulated (but in operation extremely unlikely) leak. A leak was simulated by injecting a known volume of CO 2 into the sediments at a depth of ∼3 m in the region of the proposed Goldeneye CCS reservoir (Dean and Tucker, 2017), a depleted field offshore from Scotland in the Outer Moray Firth (North Sea). LOC sensors made measurements at various locations around the site of CO 2 release to both determine the spatial extent of the releases impact and quantify the release.…”
Section: Applications and Deploymentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ambitious but successful experiment demonstrated the ability to monitor and quantify the integrity of offshore Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) reservoirs through detecting and measuring the chemical signature of a simulated (but in operation extremely unlikely) leak. A leak was simulated by injecting a known volume of CO 2 into the sediments at a depth of ∼3 m in the region of the proposed Goldeneye CCS reservoir (Dean and Tucker, 2017), a depleted field offshore from Scotland in the Outer Moray Firth (North Sea). LOC sensors made measurements at various locations around the site of CO 2 release to both determine the spatial extent of the releases impact and quantify the release.…”
Section: Applications and Deploymentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of research projects have addressed strategies for marine GCS monitoring, providing guidance about how to monitor the marine environment in sufficient detail without prohibitive costs [4,7,[11][12][13][14][15]. Considering that the probability of leakage from a well-planned CO 2 storage site is considered low [5,6], it is generally not necessary or economically sound to monitor the entire region in detail over an extended period of time.…”
Section: Strategies For Marine Gcs Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where risk structures are present, dedicated marine monitoring may be necessary to verify that there is no leakage through these structures, and to ensure that potential leakage is promptly detected such that corrective actions may be taken. The bowtie method, based on the barrier approach to risk management [11,17], provides a framework for a systematic risk assessment, including identifying risks and proposing proportional monitoring efforts. Figure 1 illustrates a risk-based approach to marine GCS monitoring, where an initial monitoring scope is set based on available information and an initial risk assessment, and is continuously re-evaluated as new information becomes available.…”
Section: Using a Risk-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, measurement (modelling and analysis of geology and hydrology of the injection system in beginning), monitoring (tracking the movement of the plume) and verification (verifying that the CO2 remains confined and there is no leak) programme, abbreviated here to MMV, should be designed and implemented. It is basically concerned with the capability to measure the amount of CO2 storage at a particular site, to map its spatial migration over time, to develop techniques for the early detection (monitoring) of any leakage and finally to verify that the stored CO2 is isolated and will not adversely affect the host ecosystem (Dean and Tucker, 2017; 7. 8.…”
Section: Measurement Monitoring and Verification (Mmv) Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, economics and environmental risks are essential to be considered for any geologic carbon sequestration project Dean and Tucker, 2017;Castaneda-Herrera et al, 2018). Storage site location and complexity affect the infrastructure costs while depth of formation, rock properties, number of wells and the location (onshore or offshore) are the key factors which impact the storage cost (Solomon, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%