2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.orl.2008.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A robust approach to the chance-constrained knapsack problem

Abstract: Chance-constrained programming is a relevant model for many concrete problems. However, it is known to be very hard to tackle directly. In this paper, the chance-constrained knapsack problem (CKP) is addressed. Relying on the recent advances in robust optimization, a tractable combinatorial algorithm is proposed to solve CKP. It always provides feasible solutions for CKP. Moreover, for two specific classes of uncertain knapsack problems, it is proved to solve CKP at optimality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show that when C 2 Z, problem CO C can be solved in Oðn 1=2 sÞ, improving over the solution time of OðnsÞ from Bertsimas and Sim (2003). Hence, our result extends to a large class of dynamic programming algorithms the ideas proposed by Klopfenstein and Nace (2008) and Monaci, Pferschy, and Serafini (2013) for the robust knapsack problem, by using a more general description of dynamic programming. In Section 5, we present a numerical comparison of models CO C and CO c on the shortest path problem and on the hop-constrained path diversified network design problem.…”
Section: Contributions and Structure Of The Papermentioning
confidence: 63%
“…We show that when C 2 Z, problem CO C can be solved in Oðn 1=2 sÞ, improving over the solution time of OðnsÞ from Bertsimas and Sim (2003). Hence, our result extends to a large class of dynamic programming algorithms the ideas proposed by Klopfenstein and Nace (2008) and Monaci, Pferschy, and Serafini (2013) for the robust knapsack problem, by using a more general description of dynamic programming. In Section 5, we present a numerical comparison of models CO C and CO c on the shortest path problem and on the hop-constrained path diversified network design problem.…”
Section: Contributions and Structure Of The Papermentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Recently, different groups of researchers are interested in develop more elaborated uncertainty sets in order to address the issue of over-conservative in worst case models while maintaining the computational tractability. Also several works have established the link between the chance-constrained technique and robust optimization [32,12,19,14]. In our work, the only difference between the deterministic counterpart of the robust model and the CCP model are the different safety factors used by each model.…”
Section: Solution and Analysis II -The Role Of The Safety Factormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…If the above problem is infeasible for Γ = 0 there is no solution to problem (15) either. The problem RKP(Γ) can be solved using a dynamic programming algorithm as indicated in Klopfenstein & Nace (2008). The main difficulty in these approximations is that for many Γ the RKP(Γ) problem may be infeasible.…”
Section: Then X Is Feasible For the Canonical Problem On Constraint Imentioning
confidence: 99%