2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-021-02368-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A robust fusion algorithm of LBP and IMF with recursive feature elimination-based ECG processing for QRS and arrhythmia detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, automatic and computerized systems can be more useful. A traditional automatic arrhythmia recognition system includes (i) preprocessing [ 2 ], (ii) features extraction such as beat segmentation [ 3 ], QRS complex [ 4 ], R-peak or R-R interval [ 5 ], wavelet transform (WT) [ 5 ], time-frequency [ 6 ], morphological learning [ 6 ], and (iii) classification such as artificial neural network (ANN) [ 7 ], support vector machine (SVM) [ 8 ], decision tree (DT) [ 9 , 10 ], and random forest (RF) [ 8 ] steps. However, despite a good number of shallow learning methods (features engineering techniques) with promising results for identifying arrhythmias from ECG signals, these are unable to properly describe the optimal features of signals and are prone to overfitting [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, automatic and computerized systems can be more useful. A traditional automatic arrhythmia recognition system includes (i) preprocessing [ 2 ], (ii) features extraction such as beat segmentation [ 3 ], QRS complex [ 4 ], R-peak or R-R interval [ 5 ], wavelet transform (WT) [ 5 ], time-frequency [ 6 ], morphological learning [ 6 ], and (iii) classification such as artificial neural network (ANN) [ 7 ], support vector machine (SVM) [ 8 ], decision tree (DT) [ 9 , 10 ], and random forest (RF) [ 8 ] steps. However, despite a good number of shallow learning methods (features engineering techniques) with promising results for identifying arrhythmias from ECG signals, these are unable to properly describe the optimal features of signals and are prone to overfitting [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on various feature selection strategies, three categories of feature selection algorithms can be distinguished: Filter [3][4][5][6][7][8], Wrapper [9][10][11][12][13][14][15], and Embedded [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. The Filter method primarily relies on a vast variety of statistical metrics or informationtheoretic measures to assess the usefulness or duplication of data aspects and thereafter choose the most advantageous variables for modeling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%