1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19960530)15:10<1033::aid-sim215>3.0.co;2-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Robust Method for Proportional Hazards Regression

Abstract: In this paper we give an informal introduction to a robust method for survival analysis which is based on a modification of the usual partial likelihood estimator (PLE). Large sample results lead us to expect reduced bias for this robust estimator compared with the PLE whenever there are even slight violations of the model. In this paper we investigate three types of violation: (a) varying dependency structure of survival time and covariates over the sample; (b) omission of influential covariates, and (c) erro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Functional relations of bone marrow blasts and cytopenias with prognostic risk were analyzed to define appropriate categories for score calculation. 22 Robust Cox models 23 for survival, time to transformation, and combination of both were built to derive the relative weights within the score. To compensate for possible heterogeneities, analyses were stratified by data source, year of diagnosis, and age.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional relations of bone marrow blasts and cytopenias with prognostic risk were analyzed to define appropriate categories for score calculation. 22 Robust Cox models 23 for survival, time to transformation, and combination of both were built to derive the relative weights within the score. To compensate for possible heterogeneities, analyses were stratified by data source, year of diagnosis, and age.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been well documented in the literature that the Cox model is sensitive even to slight departures from the assumptions (Samuels (1978), Bednarski (1989), Minder and Bednarski (1996)), and that its IF is not bounded (Reid and Crépeau, 1985). Valsecchi et al (1996) provide a detailed illustration of how long survivors, for instance, may affect the estimates.…”
Section: Robust Survival Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However the use of such weighting in combination with robust modeling methods is not consistently implemented. For example, sampling weights are implemented in one robust method that focuses on robustness to variation in proportional hazards (PH) over time [5,7], but not in another that is more robust to influential outliers [3,8,9]. These two methods incorporate a similar approach to robustness, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%