A role for homologous recombination proteins in cell cycle regulation

Abstract

Eukaryotic cells respond to DNA breaks, especially double-stranded breaks (DSBs), by activating the DNA damage response (DDR), which encompasses DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint signaling. The DNA damage signal is transmitted to the checkpoint machinery by a network of specialized DNA damage-recognizing and signal-transducing molecules. However, recent evidence suggests that DNA repair proteins themselves may also directly contribute to the checkpoint control. Here, we investigated the role of homologous recombination (HR) proteins in normal cell cycle regulation in the absence of exogenous DNA damage. For this purpose, we used Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells expressing the Fluorescent ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicators (Fucci). Systematic siRNA-mediated knockdown of HR genes in these cells demonstrated that the lack of several of these factors alters cell cycle distribution, albeit differentially. The knock-down of MDC1, Rad51 and Brca1 caused the cells to arrest in the G2 phase, suggesting that they may be required for the G2/M transition. In contrast, inhibition of the other HR factors, including several Rad51 paralogs and Rad50, led to the arrest in the G1/G0 phase. Moreover, reduced expression of Rad51B, Rad51C, CtIP and Rad50 induced entry into a quiescent G0-like phase. In conclusion, the lack of many HR factors may lead to cell cycle checkpoint activation, even in the absence of exogenous DNA damage, indicating that these proteins may play an essential role both in DNA repair and checkpoint signaling.

Screening of Pleural Mesotheliomas for DNA-damage Repair Players by Digital Gene Expression Analysis Can Enhance Clinical Management of Patients Receiving Platin-Based Chemotherapy

“…Our results indicate that a higher gene expression of BRCA1 is highly associated with increasing clinical malignancy (indicated by higher IMIG-stage). Furthermore, a reduced XRCC2 gene expression, acting downstream of the MRN-complex 95 , correlated with with progressive disease more often. Similarly, increased XRCC3 gene expression, forming a complex together with XRCC2 , was observed in tumours showing higher TNM-stage.…”

MAR‐Mediated transgene integration into permissive chromatin and increased expression by recombination pathway engineering

“…S2A). Cells were re‐transfected 72 h later with pGEGFP or p1‐68‐GFP, and pSVpuro, using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), once the effects of the knock‐down on cell cycle progression had disappeared (Kostyrko et al, ). The cells were trypsinized and counted 24 h after the second transfection, and 10000 viable cells were seeded in complete medium into each well of a 6‐well plate.…”

CHO cells engineered for fluorescence read out of cell cycle and growth rate in real time

“…Furthermore, a CHO‐DG44 derivative with FUCCI was used in a study elucidating the role of homologous recombination proteins in cell cycle regulation . However, no project targeting real time compatible detection of the growth rate was reported, yet …”